Dear Friends,
On March 29, 2018, the Federal Communications Commission gave its approval to SpaceX’s plan to launch an unprecedented 4,425 satellites into low orbit around the Earth. And that’s only the beginning. SpaceX has applied to the FCC to increase the number of satellites to 12,000 in order to provide “ultrafast, lag-free Internet” to every square inch of the earth. 5G from space. SpaceX’s CEO, Elon Musk, has announced his intention to begin launches in 2019, to begin operating as soon as he has about 100 satellites in orbit, and to have at least 800 satellites up and running by 2020. The name of SpaceX’s project is “Starlink.”
The global electrical circuit, which sustains all life, is about to be seriously disturbed unless we act….
The biggest threats are from SpaceX and OneWeb, which have similar applications before the FCC. SpaceX’s 12,000 satellites will operate in two constellations, at 700 miles and 210 miles in altitude. They will operate at millimeter wave frequencies and they will be phased arrays. Each satellite will have thousands of antenna elements that will work together to aim highly focused, steerable beams at any desired point on the surface of the earth. Each beam from the 4,425 satellites already approved at the 700-mile height would have a maximum effective radiated power of up to 8,800 watts. The revised application for 12,000 satellites is requesting an increase to 5,000,000 watts per beam (for the upper constellation of 4,425 satellites) and 500,000 watts per beam (for the lower constellation of 7,518 satellites). The satellites will communicate both with individual users and with gateway earth stations, of which there will be several hundred just in the United States.
OneWeb’s founder and Executive Chairman is Greg Wyler. So far, OneWeb has applied to the FCC for only 4,540 satellites, but it is partnering with Airbus, which will build the satellites; Blue Origin, a subsidiary of Amazon, which will provide the rockets; and Virgin Galactic, which will launch them. Its investors include Qualcomm, Hughes Network Systems, Intelsat of Luxembourg, Marker LLC of Israel, Grupo Salinas of Mexico, SoftBank of Japan, Bharti Enterprises of India, and Coca-Cola. It received a license from the FCC for 720 low-orbit satellites in June 2017, but has already sold most of their capacity to Honeywell and other companies. Honeywell plans to use satellite transmissions to supply fast Internet to business, commercial, and military aircraft worldwide. On January 4, 2018 OneWeb filed an application for an additional fleet of 2,560 medium-orbit satellites, and on March 19, 2018 it filed an application for 1,260 additional low-orbit satellites. It is now touting its enterprise as an essential element of the worldwide rollout of 5G technology. Like SpaceX, OneWeb’s satellites will have antennas in phased arrays and use the millimeter wave spectrum. Their maximum effective power will be 6,000 watts. OneWeb intends to launch 36 satellites every 21 days beginning in the last quarter of 2018, and to begin service with the first few hundred satellites in 2019….
If 66 satellites providing only voice communication caused widespread illness and mortality among birds, horses, and people, what will a 20,000-satellite Internet-in-the-Sky do to us all?…
The global electrical circuit flows through the earth, up to the sky in thunderstorms, through the ionosphere, and back down to earth through the atmosphere and through our bodies. The current enters our bodies through the top of our head, circulates through our acupuncture meridians, and reenters the earth through our feet. In addition to direct current, it contains 8 Hz, 14 Hz, 20 Hz, 26 Hz, and 33 Hz components. These ELF frequencies are the Schumann resonances, and are identical to the brain wave frequencies of every animal. It also contains VLF frequencies. These are generated by lightning, vary seasonally and regulate our annual biorhythms. We pollute this circuit at our peril.
The strength of the atmospheric electrical current is between 1 and 10 picoamperes (trillionths of an ampere) per square meter….The experiences of astronauts are a clue to the importance of the global electrical circuit to terrestrial life. The International Space Station is not completely outside of it; the Schumann resonances are clearly detectable even at that altitude, but they are greatly diminished. In the Space Station, astronauts’ circadian rhythms are disrupted. See John R. Ball and Charles H. Evans, Jr., editors, Safe Passage: Astronaut Care for Exploration Missions, National Academies Press 2001. And Russian authors have noted that “a decrease in all physiological processes” occurs during space missions and that these changes are “identical to those that occur during the process of aging on Earth.” (Irina M. Lirina et al., “Protein expression changes caused by spaceflight as measured for 18 Russian cosmonauts,” Nature, Scientific Reports 7:8142 (2017)). It is doubtful that human beings could long survive if completely removed electrically from Earth, for example in a colony on Mars such as Elon Musk is also contemplating.
Another piece of the puzzle is provided by research that has been done at Stanford University and elsewhere on the properties of the ionosphere and magnetosphere—the regions of space hundreds to thousands of miles above our heads that contain mostly electrons, protons and other electrically-charged ions.
It was discovered more than forty years ago that ELF and VLF radiation from all of the power lines on earth is reaching the ionosphere, and the magnetosphere above it, where it is being amplified up to one hundred thousand-fold by interaction with electrons. As a result, the earth’s electromagnetic environment has been changed. The behavior of the magnetosphere, the structure of the Van Allen belts, the values of the Schumann resonances, and even the weather here on earth, have been altered. This phenomenon is called “power line harmonic radiation.”
It was further discovered that the radiation from VLF radio stations is also amplified tremendously in the magnetosphere—so much so that a radio signal of 0.5 watts sent from an antenna in Antarctica can be detected by a receiver in northern Quebec.
What does this have to do with SpaceX and OneWeb? Or, to rephrase the question, if a single half-watt radio station broadcasting from the earth has a measurable effect on the magnetosphere, what effect will 20,000 satellites, some located directly in the ionosphere and some directly in the magnetosphere, each blasting out up to five million watts—what effect will that have on life below?
The answer has to do with the fact that the satellite signals—like all wireless signals today—will be pulsed at ELF and VLF frequencies. That is how the data will be sent. Like an AM radio, the ionosphere and magnetosphere will demodulate, or extract, the ELF and VLF components, and then amplify them tremendously. Until now nobody has looked for these effects from satellites. But a Stanford physicist with whom I have been corresponding explained why this could happen and showed me how to estimate the minimum power level that would be necessary. Iridium had enough power, and the new satellites will have more than enough power: as a rough estimate, the five-million-watt SpaceX beams will contain enough energy up to a distance of 135 miles from each satellite for their ELF/VLF components to be demodulated by the ionospheric plasma and then amplified in the magnetosphere.
The result is similar to how dirty electricity gets onto house wiring. All of the electronic equipment—dimmer switches, fluorescent lamps, computers, cell phone chargers, etc.—that are plugged into our walls produce electronic noise that travels on the wiring, radiates into our homes, and makes us sick.
Except that now the dirty electricity will get onto our bodies’ wiring. The noise from 20,000 satellites that are plugged into the ionosphere and magnetosphere will pollute the global electrical circuit that we are all plugged into. It will kill us and it must be stopped….
SpaceX’s initial goal is to sign up 40 million subscribers. If OneWeb signs up another 40 million, and one-tenth of the subscribers are online at any given time, electronic noise from 8,000,000 additional signals, to start with, will pollute the global circuit.
There are other serious environmental impacts from the intensive use of space, some of which I outlined in my first book. For example, the rockets of both SpaceX and OneWeb will burn kerosene. Burning kerosene in space produces prodigious amounts of black soot, which accumulates in the stratosphere. Black carbon absorbs so much solar energy that its contribution to global warming is two million times greater per unit mass than carbon dioxide. Just 35 launches of SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket per year would produce an amount of warming roughly equal to the amount of warming produced in a year by the world’s one billion cars. I am extrapolating from the estimates of Martin Ross of the Aerospace Corporation, which were made in 2012 when there were 25 launches per year of much smaller kerosene-burning rockets. (M. N. Ross and P. M. Sheaffer, “Radiative forcing caused by rocket engine emissions,” Earth’s Future 2: 177-196 (2014)).
As Ross points out, the problem of black soot could be solved, or at least reduced, by using a different type of fuel. The radiation problem, however, by definition cannot be solved, because the radiation is the product. The decision-makers and investors in these companies must be made to understand that they are playing with fire, and that what they are planning to do within the next two years will have fatal consequences.
The key players are:
For SpaceX: Residence
Chief Officers
Elon Musk, CE Bel Air, CA
Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO Rolling Hills Estates, CA
Bret Johnson, CFO Los Angeles area
Board of Directors
David S. Kidder, CEO of Bionic Solutions Rye, NY
Luke Nosek, founder and partner of Gigafund San Francisco, CA
Antonio Gracias, founder, Valor Equity Partners Chicago, IL
Donald Harrison, Google’s vice president
for corporate development Mountain View, CA
Kimbal Musk (Elon’s younger brother) Boulder, CO
Barry Schuler, advisor Napa, CA
Lead Investors
Founders Fund (Abigail Johnson, CEO) (Boston, MA)
Google ($900 million)
Nihal Mehta, founding partner of Eniac Ventures New York, NY
Bracket Capital (Yalda Aoukar, CEO) (London)
For OneWeb:
Board of Directors
Greg Wyler, Founder and Chairman Stuart, FL
Eric Béranger, CEO Paris, France
Thomas Enders, CEO of Airbus Toulouse, France
Paul E. Jacobs (also on board of Dropbox) Sacramento area
Alex Clavel, Head of Corporate Finance of SoftBank Palo Alto, CA
Ohad Finkelstein, Co-Founder and Partner
of Marker LLC Israel
Ricardo Salinas, Founder and Chairman
of Grupo Salinas Mexico City
Large Investors
Stephen Spengler, CEO of Intelsat Luxembourg
Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon Medina, WA
Richard Branson, CEO of Virgin Galactic British Virgin Islands
Sunil Mittal, CEO of Bharti Enterprises New Delhi, India
Dean Manson, Executive Vice President of Echo Star Englewood, CO
Biggest Customer
Honeywell (Darius Adamczyk, CEO) (Morris Plains, NJ)
Owner of Satellite License
Boeing (Dennis Muilenburg, CEO) (Collinsville, IL)
All these people have families and children and have a stake in the future of the Earth. Some—for example, Kimbal Musk and his wife, Christiana—are long-time advocates for the environment and investors in environmental causes.
Please contact me if you want to help. What is needed is a team of dedicated people who can raise funds, mobilize scientists, petition governments, and call and meet with environmental organizations.
Also please contact me if you know any of the gentlemen or ladies I have listed above, or if you know someone who can get us an audience with one of them. All we need is one. An opening into that community of billionaires, to begin a dialogue that will save this planet.
-Arthur Firstenberg, for
Global Union Against Radiation Deployment from Space (GUARDS)
May 14, 2018
(505) 471-0129
Please forward widely. http://www.radiationdangers.com/satellite-radiation/
…………………………………………………
………………………………………………………….
3-20-18 5G going UP: To ALL you-tubers You may want to watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yOwzTXUTuA
…………………………………
In February of last year, only five senators and 16 representatives voted "no" on the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
We have, consequently, hundreds of new satellites competing for space in our crowded skies, hundreds of thousands of new communication towers sprouting up in our midst and the uncontrolled proliferation of wireless broadcasts. This amounts to an electromagnetic war on life from which there soon will be no place to hide.
While the visual impact of telecommunications technology has come under fire, environmental circles have paid surprisingly little attention to its biological impact - one of the most dramatic and rapid alterations of the Earth's electromagnetic environment ever to occur.
Yet, there has been a deliberate absence of debate on microwaves and radiation.
Meanwhile, virtually the entire microwave spectrum, from 300 megahertz (MHz) to 100 gigahertz (GHz), has been or will soon be on the auction block. (Cellular phones operate within this range at 860- 900 MHz; personal communications service phones operate at 1,800-2,000 MHz.)
Meanwhile, virtually the entire microwave spectrum, from 300 megahertz (MHz) to 100 gigahertz (GHz), has been or will soon be on the auction block. (Cellular phones operate within this range at 860- 900 MHz; personal communications service phones operate at 1,800-2,000 MHz.)
Telecommunications companies are spending billions of dollars leasing chunks of spectrum from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for use in dozens of new types of cellular, paging, radio, television and other global networks that will link computers and people without the inconvenience of costly, hard-to-maintain copper wires.
Personal communications services (PCS), the largest of these networks, are spreading over the Earth's surface with incredible speed.
Personal communications services (PCS), the largest of these networks, are spreading over the Earth's surface with incredible speed.
Introduced on a wide scale only last November, PCS already provides wireless voice, fax and data transmission capabilities to subscribers in hundreds of US cities.
• Sprint PCS is building 50,000 new broadcast towers this year
• Omnipoint Communications has erected thousands of antennas in New York City and plans to spread nationwide
• Primeco Personal Communications is following suit, along with Pacific Bell, Bell South and Western Wireless
Altogether, 1,500 companies have obtained PCS licenses from the FCC.
The industry is mounting antennas on apartment buildings, water towers, churches, schools, billboards, highway signs, lamp posts and traffic lights - while telling us that all this is safe. But the energy emitted by PCS antennas is extremely close in frequency (1.8- 2.0 GHz) and power (up to 1,000 watts or more) to the energy that cooks food in microwave ovens.
Essentially, hundreds of thousands of microwave ovens are being placed on rooftops and towers - and they're being turned on with their doors open.
The electromagnetic bombardment from telecommunications systems is so great that it also has become necessary for companies to spend huge sums of money to develop better shielding for pacemakers, hearing aids, computers, guidance systems in airplanes and helicopters, and most other electronic equipment.
Despite well-documented exposes such as Paul Brodeur's The Zapping of America (1977) and Robert Becker's Cross Currents (1990), the industry continues to deny that this same radiation has any effect on human beings, plants or animals. We are being asked to believe that there are no non-thermal effects and that if microwaves aren't strong enough to cook us, they will do us no harm.
Much as the asbestos and tobacco industries have done, the telecommunications industry has suppressed damaging evidence about its technology since at least 1927, when colloid chemist Ernst Muth first discovered that red blood cells exposed to radio frequency waves (at levels far less powerful than permitted today by the FCC) are forced to line up in chains resembling strings of pearls….
Biologist Allan Frey, for example, was publishing data that showed damage to the heart, nervous system, eyes and other organs even by levels of microwaves permissible in the Eastern bloc. Some of his work was done under contract with the US Air Force and Navy.
Frey also demonstrated that people can hear low-level pulsed signals as buzzes, clicks or tones in their heads. Other scientists confirmed that even extremely low-energy microwave signals heat enough brain tissue to set up pressure waves inside the head - similar to those occurring in a concussion. When the pressure waves reach the inner ear, they produce a sound.
After three decades of research, Frey complained that very little of this kind of information was reaching the public.
In 1983, he wrote that US citizens,
"have to fight for every piece they want and then cannot trust what little they get."
Frey warned of "a small group of scientists controlling the setting of health hazard standards, controlling what research bearing on that standard gets funded or published, while providing testimony for various companies and government agencies to the effect that substantial microwave energy exposure is safe."
This "small group of scientists" was made up of engineers and veterinarians, not doctors, biologists or epidemiologists.
The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) - the agency that was (and still is) setting microwave exposure standards - is not a government agency but a private organization funded and controlled by industry.
Though Congress authorized the FCC to set safety standards for radio frequency and microwave broadcasts, the FCC has seen fit to make a voluntary industry standard the law of the land. In February 1996, Congress made ANSI's standard not a minimum but a maximum safety standard.
The 1996 Telecommunications Act declares:
Though Congress authorized the FCC to set safety standards for radio frequency and microwave broadcasts, the FCC has seen fit to make a voluntary industry standard the law of the land. In February 1996, Congress made ANSI's standard not a minimum but a maximum safety standard.
The 1996 Telecommunications Act declares:
"No state or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions."
In addition, the 1996 federal budget cut all EPA funding for studying the health effects of radio frequency and microwave transmissions. It wasn't restored in 1997. This means that if novel telecommunications technologies fall within the FCC's safety guidelines but nevertheless prove hazardous, injured citizens will have no recourse, and a threatened environment will receive no protection.
The most extensive and well-controlled epidemiological studies on the biological effects of radio broadcasts have been underway since 1989 near a radar station in Skrunda, Latvia.
The most extensive and well-controlled epidemiological studies on the biological effects of radio broadcasts have been underway since 1989 near a radar station in Skrunda, Latvia.
Results show,
• impaired motor function, reaction time, memory and attention among schoolchildren
• chromosome damage in cows
• abnormal growth, shortened life span and impaired reproduction in duckweed plants
• decreased thickness of growth rings in pine trees
• premature aging of pine needles and cones
The levels of radio waves involved are not much higher than what we receive on Earth from the newest telecom satellites.
Data published by radio frequency/microwave consultant Kathy Hawk in her 1996 book Case Study in the Heartland document the disappearance of birds and honey bees, an increase in farm animal birth defects and the sudden deterioration in the health of farm families living near newly erected cellular towers in the Midwest.
Perhaps the most ominous news comes from a survey by the Cellular Phone Taskforce, an organization comprised of citizens injured by radio transmissions. The task force runs a clearinghouse on health problems it believes are caused by PCS broadcast antennas.
Reports from cities throughout the world indicate a new kind of illness that coincides in every case with the activation of a PCS network.
Data published by radio frequency/microwave consultant Kathy Hawk in her 1996 book Case Study in the Heartland document the disappearance of birds and honey bees, an increase in farm animal birth defects and the sudden deterioration in the health of farm families living near newly erected cellular towers in the Midwest.
Perhaps the most ominous news comes from a survey by the Cellular Phone Taskforce, an organization comprised of citizens injured by radio transmissions. The task force runs a clearinghouse on health problems it believes are caused by PCS broadcast antennas.
Reports from cities throughout the world indicate a new kind of illness that coincides in every case with the activation of a PCS network.
The symptoms are striking:
• pressure behind the eyes
• dry, puffy lips
• swollen thyroid
• sudden rise in pulse rate and blood pressure
• pressure or pain in the chest
• insomnia
• dizziness
• headache
• nausea
• loss of appetite
• coughing or wheezing
• sinus problems
• testicular or pelvic pain
• muscle spasms
• tremors
• irritability
• memory loss
• pain in the legs or the soles of the feet
• pains that move around the body
• varying degrees of dehydration
• occasionally fever, rash or nosebleeds
The illness appears to be confined to geographical areas served by new PCS and other digital systems. Remarkably, a growing number of environmental refugees have recovered immediately upon leaving the PCS coverage area.
The net is closing. All of the older communication technologies that broadcast analog signals at relatively low frequencies are being phased out and replaced by higher-frequency digital signals that 70 years of research indicate are hazardous to life.
Microwave radiation levels in major metropolitan areas have increased 1,000-fold overnight. And telecommunications companies are well on their way to covering every square inch of the Earth with digital wireless broadcasts from Earth - and space-based antennas - faster, they are betting, than it will be possible for anyone to mount an effective opposition.
The stakes are too high to sit still.
The Telecommunications Act must be amended to require epidemiological studies on the effects of all this radiation on the public and to restore the prerogatives of local and state governments concerned about their citizens' health. Money for scientific research must be restored to the EPA. There should be full congressional hearings on the environmental implications of the wireless revolution and on the telecommunications industry's wholesale suppression of scientific evidence.
In the absence of congressional action, local communities need to challenge the constitutionality of a law that prevents them from protecting their citizens and the environment.
In the absence of congressional action, local communities need to challenge the constitutionality of a law that prevents them from protecting their citizens and the environment.
Otherwise, 1998 could be a silent spring - not because of pesticides, nukes, ozone depletion or global warming - but because of the electromagnetic fallout from the information explosion that so many in the environmental movement had counted on as our salvation. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/scalar_tech/esp_scalartech_cellphonesmicrowave20.htm
…………………………………..
3-28-16
Retired Canadian Army captain Jerry Flynn, who spent 22 years in its “Electronic Warfare” unit, is beseeching Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Canadian Medical Assn. president Dr. Chris Simpson to stop “suppressing the truth” about the dangers of Wi-Fi, Cellphones, computers, cell towers and other forms of radiation.
The Canadian government is “blind to the decades-old corruption that is ongoing within the Minister of Health’s radiation protection bureau,” he said. “Tragically, for all persons living in Canada, our provincial governments have shown themselves to be willfully silent to those of us who have made many attempts to alert them over the years.”
Flynn also called on the Obama Administration to change its policy of ignoring the Wi-Fi threat. “These are unprecedented, unbelievable times in America’s history,” he said. One can only presume that President Obama himself and his entire administration are deliberately being kept ignorant of the systemic corruption that is ongoing within the U.S. regulatory family of agencies, most notably the Federal Communications Commission and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and its International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety.
“Enabling this corruption, the remaining few media conglomerates choose to remain largely silent. If Americans are to survive this unprecedented Crime Against Humanity, they must wake up and act – before it is too late!”
Flynn spoke about the dangers of wireless utility “smart” meters at a “National Day of Action” Oct. 4, 2012.
Also rapped on the knuckles is the “sinfully silent news media” in both Canada and the U.S. Exposes of the hazards of radiation are “all over the TV news at least in Europe and Australia,” he said. ABC-TV Australia broadcast “Wi-Fried” on Feb. 16, 2016, detailing health hazards of Wi-Fi, cellphones, etc.
Flynn notes that a handful of companies control much of the media in the U.S. and that five tech companies are planning to envelope the earth in Wi-Fi:
• Google plans 200,000 Wi-Fi balloons at 62,500 feet.
• Space X plans 4,000 satellites 750 miles high.
• OneWeb will hoist 648 satellites 500-590 miles high.
• Facebook plans satellites, drones and lasers.
• Outernet plans low orbit microsatellites.
“Virtually the entire global population will be irradiated 24/7/365 by 2020 whether they like it or not by pulsed, non-thermal microwave on the same frequency as microwave ovens-2.4 Gigahertz,” said Flynn.
The Federal Communications Commission on March 17 gave Google approval to float the balloons in all 50 states. Flynn notes that FCC chairman Tom Wheeler chaired the CTIA-Wireless Assn. from 1992-2004 and is the only person ever named to the Cable TV and Wireless Halls of Fame.
The passage of the Telecommunications Act in 1996 made it illegal for any community to consider health or the environment in regulating cell towers, said Flynn.
In 1995, he noted, just as the Environmental and Protection Agency was about to introduce national exposure limits that would protect the public from non-thermal electromagnetic radiation, the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations cut the EPA’s budget saying it should not be “engaged in electromagnetic activities.”
The responsibility was then transferred to the FCC whose independence is open to question, said Flynn who calls the FCC “corrupt” and “lacking in EMF scientists.
“It is preposterous but tragically true,” said Flynn, “that scientists and informed people around the world fear that today’s ongoing pandemic corruption, suppression of the truth, deception and lies, aided by the sinfully silent news media—unless it can somehow be stopped—will bring about the demise of mankind and all life on earth as we know it.”
…
Flynn published a statement March 25 titled, “Imprisoning Children and Teachers in Microwaved Classrooms Is a Crime Beyond Belief.”
Flynn published a statement March 25 titled, “Imprisoning Children and Teachers in Microwaved Classrooms Is a Crime Beyond Belief.”
He said that “Time is running out for Americans to wake up and realize that their children are being unintentionally but seriously harmed by technologically-ignorant, irresponsible authorities who, sadly, have allowed themselves to be co-opted by the wireless and telecom industry and electric utilities whose sole concern is profit – even at the expense of an unsuspecting and defenseless public’s health and well-being!”
Said Flynn: “Renowned scientists such as Dr. Neil Cherry, Dr. Sam Milham, Dr. Robert O. Becker and others have long said that any man-made radio frequency radiation, no matter how weak the signal, is hazardous to humans and all forms of life - especially ‘pulsed’ M/W radiation!
Microwave ovens cook food and heat liquids on the M/W frequency of 2.4 GHz While M/W ovens emit very high powered radiation, they do so for relatively short periods of time before they shut OFF. Note: The form of radiation emitted by M/W ovens is ‘continuous wave,’ which is less harmful to humans and all living things than is a Wi-Fi router’s ‘pulsed’ radiation.
“Inconceivably, precious children and their teachers are forced – every moment they are at school - to sit in classrooms with powerful industrial-grade Wi-Fi routers above their heads that emit the more dangerous ‘pulsed’ form of M/W radiation on frequencies which the US Military knows are lethal to all human organs and organ systems: 2.4 GHz or both 2.4 and 5.8 GHz! W-Fi routers emit their pulsed non-thermal radiation in all directions constantly, 24/7/365, blanketing entire areas ranging in distance from just hundreds of feet out to encompass a school’s entire property!
“Non-industry scientists know that the harmful biological and health effects of low-level pulsed radiation are cumulative. It is not a question of IF a student or teacher will be harmed, but how much accumulated radiation over how many months and/or years can their individual bodies endure before they succumb to serious illness?
“Since its inception in 1948, the World Health Organization has experienced almost constant turmoil and challenges. No longer enjoying secure funding from governments, it now relies on voluntary contributions from governments and other sources. Currently, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [Bill is the founder of Microsoft] is one of the biggest contributors to WHO! Radiation regulatory agencies, electric power utilities, and the wireless/telecom industries have meticulously studied, learned from and improved upon the extremely successful, deceitful tactics employed by the tobacco industry for so many profitable decades.
Flynn spent two years at one of Canada’s largest and most sensitive radio intelligence-gathering stations, where he supervised some 200+ specially-trained radio operators who conducted research.
He said the U.S. military has long known that the most harmful radio/microwave frequencies to man are those within the band 900 MHz to 5 GHz (900 million to 5 billion Herz), for they penetrate all organs and organ systems of the body, thus putting all human organ systems at risk. “This is precisely why these frequencies are used in M/W weapons of war!” he said. https://www.odwyerpr.com/story/public/6595/2016-03-28/governments-authorities-ignore-60-years-dangers-wi-fi.html
-comments to above-
-comments to above-
Apr. 1, 2016, by George
Served a long time in military communications and in 1976 it was known that microwave non-ionised radiation exposure to military personnel caused neurological, cardiovascular, and haemodynamic disturbances, including neurasthenic symptoms and 40 years later the world population are suffering a plague of the same disturbances and increased types of symptoms that can be added to neurasthenic symptoms.
I returned from Vietnam and nearly died from encephalitis and six months later three soldiers from my troop died from encephalitis, which is a brain inflammation which no doubt was caused by microwave non-ionised radiation exposure. I've seen many illnesses in animals as well since the introduction of wireless technology in the 1990s.
Apr. 4, 2016, by Nohan
2013 - Swiss Insurance - Emerging Risks
These risks are now Exclusion 32
The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the market as standard. The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionizing radiation exposure.
The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the market as standard.
The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionizing radiation exposure.
We will not:
a) make any payment on your behalf for any claim, or
b) incur any costs and expenses, or
c) reimburse you for any loss, damage, legal expenses, fees or costs sustained by you,
d) pay any medical expenses: directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.
……………………..
No comments:
Post a Comment