Wednesday, August 25, 2021

legal immunity given to vaccine makers, overview


  Take into consider these facts.  Pfizer has a long history of criminal behaviorand has been found guilty legally of that.  DARPA granted $32.7 million in 2013 to Pfizer and Moderna for RNA vaccine.  Bill Gates met and made a deal with the biggest Western leaders of pharmaceuticals at the end of Sept. 2020.  Big pharma, big finance, big media and big IT have been often acting in concert as if marching toward a globalist one-world government led by them and their pals, including the Biden admin. which is so cozy with China.    -R.

..........................................................................................

 

  The 2005 law empowers the U.S. HHS secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines and treatments, unless there's “willful misconduct” by the company.  The protection lasts until 2024.

Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law.“    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html

…………………………………..........................…

7-30-20  (Reuters) - AstraZeneca has been granted protection from future product liability claims related to its COVID-19 vaccine hopeful by most of the countries with which it has struck supply agreements, a senior executive told Reuters.  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-astrazeneca-results-vaccine-liability/astrazeneca-to-be-exempt-from-coronavirus-vaccine-liability-claims-in-most-countries-idUSKCN24V2EN

…………………………………….............................

10-2-20   European governments will pay claims above an agreed limit against AstraZeneca over side-effects from its potential COVID-19 vaccine, under different terms to a deal struck with Sanofi, an EU official told Reuters.  https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/10/astrazeneca-partial-immunity-eu-vaccine/

…………………………………………….......................

10-15-20    In last week’s federal budget the Australian government announced it had given AstraZeneca and a less known company vaccines indemnity against liability for rare side-effects.  Although details are unclear, it appears the government would foot the bill for compensation if a member of the public wins legal action against the drug company.    https://theconversation.com/who-pays-compensation-if-a-covid-19-vaccine-has-rare-side-effects-heres-the-little-we-know-about-australias-new-deal-147846

……………….......................................................…….

Latin America is big on AstraZeneca vax.  https://www.as-coa.org/articles/timeline-tracking-latin-americas-road-vaccination

…………………………………….................................

12-2-20   The UK government has granted pharmaceutical giant Pfizer a legal indemnity protecting it from being sued, enabling its coronavirus vaccine to be rolled out across the country as early as next week.  Ministers have also changed the law in recent weeks to give new protections to companies such as Pfizer, giving them immunity from being sued by patients in the event of any complications.

  NHS staff providing the vaccine, as well as manufacturers of the drug, are also protected…. under regulation 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations 2012 which allows an unlicensed medication to be used in an emergency such as a pandemic….Pfizer’s UK managing director refused to explain why the company needed an indemnity.

Ben Osborn said:  “We're not actually disclosing any of the details around any of the aspects of that agreement and specifically around the liability clauses."   https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html

…………………………………………………………

8-12-20    I have prescriptions for ivermectin from two doctors. Why can’t all Australians have that freedom to choose? Why isn’t Australia’s government adopting ivermectin?  Why did the TGA threaten and try to silence me with a letter when I discussed ivermectin with constituents as their representative in parliament? I mentioned ivermectin in a YouTube video and was banned for a week. Member of parliament Craig Kelly made statements based on solid data. After speaking about ivermectin, Facebook banned him forever. Why are doctors scared of being struck off the doctors’ registry if they prescribe ivermectin to cure their patients?Consider the ownership of vaccine makers. Alphabet owns YouTube and Google.  Alphabet owns 12 per cent of Vaccitech, which created the AstraZeneca vaccine.  YouTube bans videos mentioning ivermectin as a COVID treatment.  Aren’t these conflicts of interest?  If ivermectin was approved for COVID, what would happen to big pharma’s hundreds of billions of dollars in profits?  These profits are a transfer of wealth from taxpayers to big pharma….

Before becoming health minister, Greg Hunt was the environment minister, where he joined Malcolm Turnbull steering a law through Parliament as a basis for a global carbon dioxide tax.  In 2000 and 2001, he spent two years at the World Economic Forum in Davos developing strategy. A simple question: did he work on the forum’s Great Reset?  Why has Minister Hunt falsely claimed that the government’s COVID policy is based on science when he is contradicting science?   -Malcolm Roberts to Australian Parliament, 8-12-21  https://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/ivermctin-why-is-it-banned/


No comments:

Post a Comment