balance10: some Bilderberg meetings summaries: 1962,1963,1980,1995

May 8, 2009

Establishment media debunkers still scoff and sneer at independent researchers who dare claim that 150 of the world’s most influential powerbrokers meeting in secret to discuss the future of the planet might equate to something more than an informal talking shop, calling such assertions “conspiracy theories”.

Indeed the sheer stupidity of debunkers to suggest that an event that attracts the titans of government, industry, banking, business and academia at which the most pressing global issues of the day are vigorously discussed under the cloak of a mutually agreed media blackout has no bearing on future world events is the most laughable “conspiracy theory” ever uttered.

Bilderberg’s 2009 agenda has already been leaked before their May 14-17 meeting in Vouliagmeni, Greece. According to investigative journalist Daniel Estulin, one of Bilderberg’s aims is to smear anti-Lisbon Treaty activists and politicians by planting derogatory stories in the media, enabling them to silence opposition to an EU federal superstate that Bilderberg has been carefully cultivating since their very first meetings in the 1950’s – a fact, not a conspiracy theory, proven by Bilderberg’s own internal documents. https://www.prisonplanet.com/leaked-1955-bilderberg-docs-outline-plan-for-single-european-currency.html

...................................................................................................................................................

204. Secrecy is a sign of lack of knowledge. At times our Community is accused of reclusion and of unwillingness to help people. You yourselves know and have seen us in various places and have seen our agents.

(by Schmiechen, 1882)

-Morya: Community 1926
.......................................................................................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

at page 13:

https://file.wikileaks.org/file/bilderberg-meeting-report-1962.pdf.

..........................................................................................................................................................

A French participant who had occupied a high position in a previous French government discussed (that)…it was normal that 200 million Europeans should wish to take part more effectively in the direction of world affairs and that America's allies should wish to extend their research and their activity in the nuclear field since the Atlantic Pact had never been described as implying an American nuclear monopoly: France and England would never have accepted such an arrangement. Atlantic institutions must accordingly be adapted to those aspirations….

The speaker concluded, that the future of the Alliance required European integration combined with sufficiently developed institutions so that the nuclear powers of Europe would be, so to speak, trustees for the rest while the Alliance, instead of being a treaty between the United States and fourteen of fifteen separate countries, would be a treaty between the United States of America and the United States of Europe. The need for a united Europe as the "second pillar" of the Atlantic Alliance, put forward by a German speaker, was raised by several other speakers during the discussion. "Two keys are better than five fingers", said a German participant in this connexion and the speaker emphasised the importance of Great Britain and the Scandinavian countries adhering to Europe….

By way of corollary, it would be up to the United States to waive its power of veto and up to France and the United Kingdom to make the gesture of assigning their nuclear forces to Europe. Such a formula, (a different French) speaker contended, would involve fewer problems than might be thought since, in the event of nuclear attack, retaliation would be automatic and in the case of attack on a lesser scale there would be time to consult, even if only very rapidly….

It was essential to turn towards European structures of an original kind which would simultaneously include a close harmony between Great Britain and France and an association of the other countries which would assume a share of the joint financial burden but also a share of the manufacturing activities, possibly those which were less specifically nuclear.

A Belgian and an American participant spoke against the idea of a "directorate" of the three nuclear powers—the United States, Great Britain and France —within NATO since, as the former put it, the other European members of the Alliance could not accept such an arrangement. The American speaker also argued that it was contrary to the spirit of the Rome Treaty that a given country should appoint itself spokesman for Europe. In addition, said this speaker, the funeral oration for the multilateral force had been delivered somewhat too quickly. As regards the future, we must reserve judgement. We were in a period of pragmatism, there was no perfect solution and we would have to rely on what we had to achieve satisfactory arrangements. Referring to the lack of balance between the world role of the United States and that of its allies, the same speaker likewise advanced the view that the end of the colonial era would enable the European powers to forge new links, new relationships, with certain young nations. Not only did the United States not hinder such a trend, he asserted, but actively favoured it since that country desired neither to see dangerous vacuums nor to wield world domination. https://file.wikileaks.org/file/bilderberg-meetings-report-1963.pdf

………………………………………………......................................................