Tuesday, January 31, 2023

modified spike protein, graphene -Brendan Godwin

the most dangerous drugs ever released on the human population in the history of medicine Brendan Godwin; 29 September 2021; Australian Bureau of Meteorology (Retired) Abstract SARS-Cov-2 was manufactured in a lab and unleashed on the world by China in late 2019. Since then the politicians and political bureaucrats have been on a crusade to have a vaccine invented and everyone jabbed. Medical science always tries to treat any disease early. The earlier you can find and treat a disease the better the chances of survival are. But with this virus, the politicians and political bureaucrats ignored and vilified known early anti-viral treatments and gove rnment policy is that there be no early treatment. Medical scientists had been trying to invent a vaccine for SARS-Cov-1 since 2003 without success. Vaccine development n ormally takes several to 10 years. But, as if by a miracle, the world seemingly had several inside a year. But what we have are not vaccines. They do not pass the patentable, legal or clinical definition of a vaccine in that they do nothing to prevent infection. They are gene therapy. They are patented as gene therapy. Calling them a vaccine is misleading and deceiving in the extreme. 2 It is not fully known what is in any of these drugs. They contain genetic material encoded with genetic instructions known as the gene sequence. We do not know what that is. They contain ingredients that are not list ed as ingredients. There are two very serious safety issues with the drugs. When in the body they generate a synthetic spike protein which is a toxin and in one of the lipid nano particles is grapheme oxide, a substance known to be poisonous to humans. The spike protein was seen in 2005 as a highly malleable bioweapon. I t has been known for a long time to be a dangerous toxin. The injections destroy a persons’ innate immune system and they have destroyed the blood and organ donation sy stems. In the rush to get these drugs into people, very basic safety tests were not done. The real world data shows that these drugs are not working. They are not stopping infections, nor transmissibility and nor deaths. Now governments are selling and people are falling for this crazy logic of “take a booster – because the 1st two shots did not work”. When injected, the gene sequence causes the body to generate a synthetic computer generated spike protein. The theory is tha t, when exposed to the virus’ real spike protein, the body will have an immunity to that as well. There is zero clinical evidence that is occurring. With a destroyed natural immune system the jabbed people are now the dangerous spreaders. They have no protection, either from the jab or their natural immune system. Safety and efficacy were never a concern. There became a sense of urgency to get people jabbed up with a known to be dangerous spike protein. The number of deaths and serious side effects are s taggering. Historically when deaths reported from a drug reached 50 on the CDC VAERS database, the drug was immediately withdrawn from the market for safety reasons. Experts have trawled through the global adverse eve nts and estimate global deaths to be at least 500,000 with 10 mil side effects half of those serious. The mortality rate from taking one of these shots in the US is 1 in 15,500. The rate for serious permanent side effect is 1 in 2,200.The injections of these drugs has taken the lives o f half a million people and destroyed the lives of 10 million more. The evidence clearly shows they have not saved one life. Anyone who thinks that a drug, that is unable to recognize a virus and prevent it’s infection, but will prevent you from dying from it, is living an illusion. Pfizer published Ingredients Lipids (including ((4-hydroxybutyl) azanediyl)bis(he xane-6,1-diyl)bis(2- hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N, N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3- phosphocholine, and ch olesterol) •Potassium chloride •Monobasic potassium phosphate •Sodium chloride •Dibasic sodium phosphate dehydrate •Sucrose The mRNA for Pfizer has been transcribed from a Chinese hamster.2 What each does is described in the reference but Messenger RNA, or mRNA, is genetic material that can instruct human cells to make a coronavirus protein called spike. Once manufactured, the spike protein teaches the immune system to recognize the coronavirus so it can be fought off in the future. That is what is supposed to happen. The mRNA genetic material is generated by computer code. The spike protein is a synthetic protein and is not the virus. Each multi-dose of the AstraZenecavial contains 5x10 11 viral particles (vp) of (ChAdOx1-S a, b) in 5mL. One dose (0.5 mL) contains 5x10 10vp of (ChAdOx1-S a, b). a Recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee aden ovirus vector encoding the ARS- CoV-2 Spike (S) glycoprotein (GP) b The vaccine is manufactured using material origina lly sourced from a human embryo (Human Embryonic Kidney cells: HEK293) This product contains genetically modified organism s (GMOs). COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca contains the excipients histidine, histidine hydrochloride monohydrate, sodium chloride, magnesi um chloride hexahydrate, disodium edetate (EDTA), sucrose, ethanol absolute, polysorbate 80 and water for injections. These are what are published for the 2 main jabs in Australia. Globally, the other two main jab drugs are Moderna and J&J. Moderna is an mRNA much the same as Pfizer, and J&J is the viral vector adenovirus much the same as AstraZeneca. For the purposes of this paper, these two drugs cover for the top 4 drugs being injected globally as Covid vaccines. The genetic material in all of these injections are coded with a gene sequence thatcauses your body to generate a spike protein. They all use the HEK-293 cells as part of development and for batch testing during manufactur ing. Pamela Acker, a vaccine researcher, explains how the process works.4 HEK stands for, and she told me, "Human Embryonic K idney." 293 stands for this is the 293rd experiment that this particular researcher did to develop a cell lines - for 293 experiments you need far more than one abortion. And we're talking probably 100s of abortions. So, the spike protein by itself is, in the words of one researcher, kind of floppy, it doesn't tend to keep its shape very well. And soscientists genetically engineered a spike protein that will keep its shape . . . And that original experiment was done in HEK-293 cells. So, the spike protein that the vaccines code for, was originally developed, effectively, in aborted fetal cells. . . . before they were going to inject this mRNA into a human be ing to see if you could get human cells to make Coronavirus spike protein, you would want to test that in cell culture, you would want to test that in a laboratory. "You need to get that tissue within about five minu tes of the abortion in order for it to be optimally viable, and if you wait an hour, it's useless." because it is done on purpose for research purposes, so they will actually deliver these babies via cesarean section, the babi es are in some cases still alive when the researchers start extracting the tissue. To the point where their heart is still beating, and they're generally not g iven any anesthetic because that would disrupt the cells that the researchers are trying to extract. So they're removing this tissue while the baby's alive , and in extreme amounts of pain, and so this makes it even more sadistic. Many human beings are killed to make these jab drugs, But what is really in them? Dr Richard Fleming in a recent presentation5 produced the results of medical studies showing the body is making antibodies to the encaps ulating material around the genetic material that is not supposed to be part of the vaccine. There is something else in the drug that is not on the ingredients list. That is supported by a recent study.6 In a 53 page paper it was found using both Electron Microscopy, Spectroscopy and other laborat ory techniques, that all 4 of the major jab drugs were found to have Graphene Oxide in them. A non disclosed ingredient. This was supported by further evidence from a former Pfizer employee Karen Kingston now working as a research analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries.7 She found using patent data and general research that graphene oxide was present in Pfizer and Moderna injection drugs.8 Main talking points: all of the COVID-19 “vaccines” are bioweapos; there are 4 PEGylated lipid nano particles in the C OVID-19 vaccines (PEG= polyethylene glycol): 1. a cholesterol lipid enables the vaccine ingredients to be transported by the blood 2. the fossil lipid adheres to the cell membrane to ma ke it permeable 3. an ionizable lipid provides a positive ionic charge so the mRNA can enter the cell 4. a PEGylated lipid made by SINOPEG, Chinese company • mRNA is very unstable, thus it needs a “biosphere” to protect it until it can enter the cell – this is provided by the lipid nano particles and graphene oxide. Sinopeg provide the grapheme oxide. [or perhaps just holds the Chinese patent -r] In another very insightful paper, James P.M. Odell looked in depth at the evidence of graphene oxide in the Spanish paper along with Karen Kingston’s research and concluded:9 Thus it is certainly not beyond the realm of possibility that Pfizer has included GO [graphene oxide] in some of its lots of Covid inoculations . In this paper James P.M. Odell looked at: 1. the evidence of graphene oxide in the Pfizer mRNA Covid 19 formulation; 2. graphene’s use in industry and medicine; and 3. the toxicity and lethality of graphene-based materi als in a biological context. He referred to numerous medical science studies and their published papers. His references accounted for one quarter of his 20 page paper. Let us be clear, the mRNA inoculations (Pfizer and Moderna) are a synthetic, chimeric pathogenic gene therapy. These have been s equenced from a computer simulation, not an isolated purified model. All the current marketed inoculations: the mRNA, DNA, viral vectored, recomb inant protein, viral-like particles, and peptide-based vaccines, use the path ogenic coronavirus’s spike protein in some way or another. (Note: The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is made up of two portions, which are S1 and S2. The S1 binds to the ACE2 receptor on the human cell surface, and S2 initiate s membrane fusion to complete cell infection.) Added to this from Dr David Martin:10 the actual patents for Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections more truthfully describe them as “gene therapy,” not vaccines…. If we are going to examine what ultimately is being injected into individuals, we need the exact sequence. . . . . [1:04:48] . . if you look at the FDA’s requirement, and if you look at the European Regulatory environment and if you look at the rest of the world’s regulatory environment, for reasons that cannot be explained, the exact sequence that has gone into what is amplified inside of the injection seems to be illusive. It seems to be something that someone cannot in fact state with a 100% certainty, the sequence is “x”. David Martin’s organisation has spent more than 20 years researching coronaviruses and no one has been able to tell him the gene sequence or genetic code used in any of these injections. Without that knowledge, no person knows what they are being injected with. No doctor in the world is able to offer informed consent to patients they are injecting. ToxicityThere are 2 toxins in these SARS-Cov-2 injections. Graphene Oxide and the Spike Protein Between them they cause a whole range of different problems. Graphene oxide has been known to be poisonous to humans for a long time. James P.M. Odell continues:12 Karen Kingston explained that the graphene oxide in the inoculations is neutrally charged (inactive), however, if/when it becomes positively charged, such as by electromagnetic radiation (radio frequency, such as wireless devices, wireless networks such as 5G, etc.), it can cause neurological damage and death depending on how much of it exists in the body and where it is located. Therefore, according to Kingston, multiple COVID-19 inoculations and booster shots are needed to gradually increase the amount of graphene oxide in the body to make the body receptive to electromagnetic radiation. GO is a fluorescent material and can be used for biosensing applications for early disease detection and detecting biologically relevant molecules. That means it could be used to detect via electro magnetic radiation whether a person has been jabbed with the substance. graphene-based neural interfaces and intelligent neuromodulation systems . . . will be able to read and modulate brain activity with very high resolution . . . intelligent graphene systems designed to modulate vagus nerve signals these materials are considered excellent for usage as electrode materials in batteries 8 The interest in using graphene-related nanomaterials (GFN) in medicine lies chiefly upon the extraordinary properties of graphene, including its mechanical properties, flexibility, transparency, and thermo-electrical conductivity.13 The holdup has been its biological toxicity. The long-term goal is to achieve "symbiosis with artificial intelligence" can be used like aluminum as a vaccine adjuvant . . . adjuvants are shown to be also immunologic and neurologically toxic and thus may result in adverse reactions, some serious or even fatal. The bottom line here is that despite these questionable explanations, graphene oxide is a known biological toxin and upon injection it accumulates in organs, glands, and tissue causing varying degrees of inflammation, oxidative stress, and cellular damage. Due to their nano-size, GFNs can reach all organs and penetrate the central nervous system. It can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by passing through the normal physiological barriers, such as the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier (BBB), and blood-placental barrier. GO may possess significant genotoxic properties and cause severe DNA damage many now claim the thrombosis, microthrombi, and vascular injury that is adversely associated with the COVID inoculation not only is due to the creation of spike proteins throughout the capillary endothelium but may also be due to GO; any inclusion of graphene oxide in the Covid inoculations has questionable and potentially nefarious purposes . . . GFNs are a known and proven toxic material to human biological regulatory systems . . . Regardless of the intent behind the use of graphine oxide, its use in vaccines is deleterious to human biology. With regard to thrombosis. Dr Jane Ruby was interviewed by Stew Peters who showed examples of what the deteriorated blood looks like when exposed to Graphene Oxide.13 She used data obtained by Dr Phillepe van Welbergen, a 40 year physician from the UK. Dr van Welbergen examined patients who had come to him with complaints and illnesses from the Covid-19 injections. He conducted several blood smear tests from several of his patients, one that had not been injected and several that had. Dr van Welbergen examined the blood smears under a regular microscope and took photos of the result that he shared with Dr Ruby. You are looking at these particular pictures side by side, same magnification under the microscope – she said. 9 She described the blood smears showing the good red blood cells on the left and the crumpled, coagulated and clumping ones on the right from the injected patient. Dr van Welbergen calls those gold tubular structures on the right tubes that they, when he magnified them even further on the regular microscope, they are actually in a tube form and you can see the opening on either end of those. Remember this looks strikingly like the grapheme oxide that we saw under the regular microscope from the Spanish researchers La Quinta Columna where you saw that sort of folded over protein that looks like it was under a piece of Kleenex under paint. 10 Stew Peters referred to several other doctors that he had interviewed, naming some, that he had since seen that all acknowledged that they believe in the validity of the Spanish researchers La Quinta Columna, they had seen the chain of custody and they believe this to be absolutely accurate. Dr Jane Ruby: The red blood cells main job is to carry oxygen to all of the body. This is the connection to why people are tied, dizzy, not feeling well, mentally confused, - they’ve been poisoned. Stew Peters seemingly described:14 Graphene Oxide is an oxygen sponge which deprives the body of necessary oxygen and causes many complications, including but not limited to anaphylactic shock, toxic blood clotting, fatal lung paralysis, mitochondrial cancer, and endothelial cancer. But provided no references for that statement. The S1 Spike Protein Dr David Martin:15 this was seen as a highly malleable bioweapon. There is no question that by 2005 it (the vaccine) was unquestionably a weapon of choice. . . . This conversation is about whether we are having a vaccine for a virus. The fact of the matter is we’re not. We are injecting a Spike protein mRNA secra. mRNA sequence which is a computer simulation, it’s not derived from nature, it’s a computer simulation of a sequence which has been known and patented for years. the evidence makes it abundantly clear that there has been no effort by any pharmaceutical company to combat the virus. This is about getting people injected with the known to be harmful S1 Spike Protein. Around mid 2021, Bret Weinstein, who has a PhD in Evolutionary Biology, on his DarkHorse podcast, interviewed Dr Robert Malone, the inventor of gene therapy vaccine technology along with Steve Kirsch.16 They started their conversation referring to the discovery by Dr Byram Bridle of the Pfizer confidential biodistribution data from Japan. Dr Byram Bridle explained that with every normal vaccine they go in the shoulder and stay in the shoulder. . . the antibodies are generated and they attack this antigen in the shoulder. But with these injections, . . . it doesn’t stay in the shoulder where we all thought it should stay, it goes throughout your entire body. It goes to your brain, to your heart. 11 Bret Weinstein That’s two problems. One problem is it isn’t where it is supposed to be And the other thing, the other problem . . . the spike protein itself we now know is very dangerous. It’s toxic, is that a fair description? Dr Robert Malone More than fair. So the whole reason to use a adenovirus vector and mRNA is not just to generate antibodies. A lot of the data, and a lot of us that are deep in this data [9:19] think that the way that they are really providing the protection is by cellular cytotoxcicity. So you’re getting CTLs against it. And that’s the reason to use this gene therapy based technology—not just to generate neutralizing antibodies but to generate cytotoxcicity. Steve Kirsch And by the way we have no problems at all with mRNA vaccines. It’s just this particular vaccine because of the spike protein and because it cleaves off the cell and it goes throughout your body, your brain, your heart and anywhere that you can have these symptoms that are so variant. . . . you know my carpet cleaner Jim. He is disabled now [He had a stroke after taking the injection] Steve Kirsch when a doctor sees a miscarriage. I’ve never seen a baby like this in my entire career where it is so bloody and the brain is split in half . . . And the woman was vaccinated a month ago and she’s 25 weeks Dr Robert Malone [14:30] This is totally new technology and that kind of gets at the core. I think one of our problems here is the assumption that this is like every other vaccine they have ever seen and it’s not. It’s very different technology. Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., M.S.,, a distinguished physician who discovered RNA transfection and invented mRNA vaccines, was on Steve Bannon’s War Room with some alarming news–new data indicates that people who have taken the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are at greater risk of getting Covid than someone who is not vaccinated.17 For more on Dr Robert Malone see.18 https://thesiscommons.org/pd3cj/ https://thesiscommons.org/pd3cj/

No comments:

Post a Comment