nanoparticle bombardment of whole environment

Many tons of nanoparticles are dispersed regularly thru the skies; they get into/on to plants, then into people, animals, rivers, oceans; they cross blood-brain barrier. See revelation: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ajyY1IFehm0T/ ………………… Increase of Aluminum Particles in the Environment due to Chemtrails during the period of Autumn 2012 to Summer 2015 within Lahore, Pakistan October 2015 International Journal Of Engineering Research and General Science 3(5) Authors: Humza Bin Masood Seemal Jelani Forman Christian College Abstract Currently the most prevailing issue of the climate change in the world is geo-engineering and one of the most prevailing issue in this is using of Chemtrails to change the climate. These Chemtrails are left over in the sky with the help of special types of jet planes which use to spray Aluminum, Barium and Strontium is the sky to make a thick parallel lines with the help of condensation due to change of air pressure at the height. These thick parallel lines are the condense layers of Aluminum, Barium and Strontium which use to stop some rays of sunlight coming to the sky but sadly it also prevents the heat rays to go out of the Earth space due to the layers formed. These sprays are causing the increase of Aluminum in the Environment as these particles can move trillions of miles and are causing different problems and diseases like Asthma in our planet Earth. The analysis performed helps to know about the increase of these Aluminum particles in our planet and the studies performed shows the problem caused by the spraying to these nano-particles in the Atmosphere. Engineering the climate is the Last and Scariest option to save planet Earth (US Scientists). Many ways are there to engineering the climate like Artificial Rain, Cloud Seeding, Giant Reflectors, Using Aerosols, Haarp Project, Silver Iodide, but Chemtrails is one of the cheapest sources for engineering the climate. In fact it cost thousands of Dollars but relating to other Climate modification techniques it is the one of the cheapest sources [1]. Trillions of Nano-particles of Aluminum, Barium and Strontium are sprayed every day over our heads in our blue sky which seems like white clouds. This is done by special kind of Air Planes which have special types of engine placement by which these air planes can move to several miles in the atmosphere. Then these air planes spray Aluminum, Barium and Strontium in form of Nano-particles. These Nano-particles can move millions of miles in atmosphere (Michel J. Murphy) [2]. Whenever you see jet Chemtrails going over you are going to get Aluminum, Barium, Strontium coming down on you; and what should it be there in the soil? Yes, it should be in the soil, it was there, always was there, well, should it be in the rain; absolutely not [3]. These Nano-particles are sprayed and due to change in pressure at higher altitudes they are condensed. These condense particles form a layer and they stop sunlight coming to our planet Earth [4]. This causes global dimming (Why in The World are they Spraying?). Global dimming is basically a term refer when the sun rays are not able to get to the earth which may cause problems of plants to grow green. Some of the scientist says that chemtrails are nothing else but the special type of contrails which causes global dimming while those who don’t support chemtrails says that this is a war technique which allows to change weather [5]. There is a debate that chemtrails are military weapons as well as debate that it is tool for many traders to earn money. “The growing evidence repeatedly confirms that aircraft are spraying dirty aerosols to warm the climate in Polar Regions for drilling access by BIG OIL as faux “National Security” [6]. Some Scientists believes that these techniques are also used by great traders to make a loss to other trader and make a profit out of that. Some use to change the weather of the particular area for their trades and many believe that it is use in war as a military weapon. The question that arises here is that is there any need for climate modification in wars and if so how do they help the military forces? Not only chemtrails but there are many military projects that cause the climate to change and one of those projects is HAARP (High frequency Active Auroral Research Program) but only the one time use of HAARP cost trillions of dollars and relatively Chemtrails are less cheap but Chemtrails require some hours for weather modification but HAARP can do the same thing within seconds [7]. These weather modification techniques are very helpful in warfare. These are use to blow snow storms on the enemy. With the help of these snow ball can be upsized easily to the size that it can break glass [8]. It is also used in places where there is soil to cause rain and it cause the soil to be muddy which is a hurdle for an enemy not only this but it also effects their health. Beside all the facts of climate modification the nano-particles of Aluminum used in this process can travel billions of miles these are causing very harmful diseases (Barb Peterson). The increase in amount of Alzheimer, Asthma, ADD, Allergy and Respiratory Orders is due to Oxides of Aluminum sprayed from chemtrails to modify the temperature of our planet Earth. Beside the fact that it causes air pollution it is true that it also causes water pollution and soil pollution. So we are not going to get oxides of aluminum by inhalation through air but also from plants. Aluminum causes defects in Plants [9]. Rose Cairns explains that there is a conspiracy of contrails and chemtrails. Many big mafias who use to make profit of this use to intermix both the terms and say that these use to disappear very soon as there are no chemtrails. Contrails are the lines caused by airplanes when going at high altitude caused under the atmospheric pressure in our blue sky which disappears hardly within 10 seconds but Chemtrails are the aerosol sprays that are used to engineer the climate. This uses to spray the nano-particles of Aluminum, Barium and Strontium in parallel lines and don’t disappears within hours [10]. On Daily basis chemtrail jets is been seen in the blue sky of Lahore but public is unaware about is that what is happening. Here the study focuses on spray of Aluminum from the chemtrail jets in the sky and as Michael J. Murphy had explained that these nano-particles travel trillions of miles so the rate is increasing drastically in the environment and are causing many health effects within the living organisms. The rate of Asthma is increasing drastically and now according 334 million patients of asthma around the globe [11]. About 15% of Pakistan’s population suffers from asthma which includes 10% children of Pakistan [12] while the annual increase of asthma is 5% [13]. https://www.researchgate.net/journal/International-Journal-Of-Engineering-Research-and-General-Science-2091-2730 ………………………. Forget microplastics: we may have a much smaller problem Nanoparticles are added to food, fabrics, cosmetics and drugs with few controls – and often end up in the sea. Now scientists are asking how safe they are. Anna Turns 25 Apr 2022 Last modified on 11 May 2022 In 2019 Ikea announced it had developed curtains that it claimed could “break down common indoor air pollutants”. The secret, it said, was the fabric’s special coating. “What if we could use textiles to clean the air?” asked Ikea’s product developer, Mauricio Affonso, in a promotional video for the “Gunrid” curtains. After explaining that the coating was a photocatalyst (“similar to photosynthesis, found in nature”), Affonso is shown gazing up at the gauzy curtains while uplifting music plays. “It’s amazing to work on something that can give people the opportunity to live a healthier life at home.
Puzzled by these claims – how could a mineral coating clean the air? – Avicenn, a French environmental nonprofit organisation, investigated. Independent laboratory tests of the Gunrid textile reported that samples contained tiny particles of titanium dioxide (TiO2) – a substance not normally toxic but which can be possibly carcinogenic if inhaled, and potentially in other forms – which supposedly gives “self-cleaning” properties to things such as paint and windows when exposed to sunlight. An image of a fibre from a Gunrid curtain under the microscope in the laboratory tests, showing nanoparticles on the surface. Photograph: LNE These tiny particles, or nanoparticles, are at the forefront of materials science. Nanoparticles come in all shapes – spheres, cubes, fibres or sheets – but the crucial thing is their size: they are smaller than 100 nanometres (a human hair is approximately 80,000nm thick). Many nanoparticles exist in nature. Nano-hairs make a gecko’s feet sticky, and nano-proteins make a spider’s silk strong. But they can be manufactured, and because they are so small, they have special properties that make them attractive across a range of endeavours – not just to companies such as Ikea. In medicine, they can transport cancer drugs directly into tumour cells, and nanosilver is used to coat medical breathing tubes and bandages. Nanos could direct pesticides to parts of a plant, or release nutrients from fertilisers in a more controlled manner. They also have more mundane uses. Synthetic nanos are added to cosmetics and food. Nanosilver is used in textiles, where it is claimed to give antibacterial properties to plasters, gym leggings, yoga mats and period pants. But scientists such as those at Avicenn are concerned that when these household items get washed, recycled or thrown away, synthetic nanos are released into the environment – making their way into the soil and sea in ways that are still not understood. Some scientists believe nanoparticles could pose an even greater threat than microplastics. Synthetic nano particles of plastic have been found in the ocean and in ice on both poles. Nanoparticles from socks and sunscreen have been found to pollute water, and certain nanos have been shown to negatively affect marine wildlife including fish and crustaceans. As with antibiotics, resistance to antimicrobial nanosilver can develop – silver-tolerant soil bacteria have now been found.  Ikea’s Gunrid ‘air-cleaning’ curtains. They were withdrawn from sale Little is known even about where nanoparticles are, let alone their effects on the environment. As they are so tiny, most experiments are conducted in labs, and it can be hard to pin down where they are applied. “The main problem with these substances is that we cannot measure them – we know they are there but they’re so tiny they’re difficult to detect, which is why you don’t hear as much about them,” says Nick Voulvoulis, professor of environmental technology at Imperial College London. He worries about the uncontrolled use of nanos in consumer products. “If nanos are used properly in applications that are useful or beneficial, that’s justified, but if they are used anywhere and everywhere because they have certain properties, that’s crazy.” Synthetic nanoparticles are not inherently harmful. Like their natural cousins many are metal-based, but they can be made of any substance. Crucially, unlike chemical compounds they cannot be dissolved. Their tiny size gives them, paradoxically, an enormous surface area, which makes them behave differently to “non-nano” versions of the same material. It can make them more mobile, more reactive – and potentially more toxic depending on shape, size, type, how a substance is released into the environment and its concentration. And released into the environment they are, on a massive scale. According to Avicenn, the release of nanos is most likely during manufacture or disposal, but it can also happen when items are washed – which is known to occur with fabrics containing nanosilver. Sewage systems cannot trap them and they end up in the ocean: the OECD says even advanced wastewater-treatment plants cannot deal with nanoparticles. We need to make sure nanos are only allowed for specific and essential uses in order to minimise any adverse effects Mathilde Detcheverry From a health perspective, inhalation is the most harmful route of exposure to nanos such as TiO2 for factory workers and consumers. Avicenn’s tests concluded that the average particle size was 4.9nm, and all 300 particles analysed were below the official nano threshold of 100nm. Ikea insisted its own tests showed the TiO2 particles were “properly bound to the fabric” and “pose no risk” to customers, and said it took workers’ safety extremely seriously. The firm has not referred to them as nanoparticles, and said that once integrated into textile surfaces there was “no good standard method to measure the particle size distribution of a material”, acknowledging that EU definitions of nanomaterials were under review. “We recognise that the tests and measurements of nano-particles are complex, especially for materials containing particles that tend to form agglomerates,” it said. As for Ikea’s curtains shedding TiO2 nanoparticles when washed or discarded, Ikea said it was “confident that the treatment is properly bound to the fabric, and therefore we do not see a risk of inhaling the treatment”, but acknowledged that “as with any textile, parts of the textile can come off during use or washing”. Many nanos do not persist for long in the environment. However, because they are consistently being discharged, levels remain fairly constant. “Nanos are ‘pseudo-persistent’ because they degrade quite quickly but they keep entering the environment,” Voulvoulis says. His main concern is whether nanos become carriers for other compounds, a subject of scientific debate. In 2009, Spanish scientists suggested nanos could bind to and transport toxic pollutants, and possibly be toxic themselves by generating reactive free radicals. If other toxic pollutants “latch on” to nanos’ surfaces, they argued, marine plants and animals could absorb them more easily. Other scientists suggest the opposite: that organic matter in sewage coat nanoparticles, rendering them less active. And others fear nanos could trigger “toxic cocktail” effects – making them more harmful in combination than individual substances would be separately.  ‘Nanoparticles are often promoted as silver bullets against pollution or bacteria,’ says one scientist, ‘but we must make sure the cure is not worse than the disease.’ Photograph: Perov Stanislav/Alamy So far, synthetic nanomaterials are relatively dispersed in the sea, and unlikely to significantly affect marine animals, says Dr Tobias Lammel of Gothenburg University, who has studied copper nanos. But he warns: “It’s possible that the concentration of some manufactured nanomaterials in the marine environment will increase … It is important to keep an eye on this.” Given the huge question marks, Avicenn wants more stringent regulations on nanos, and more caution in product design. “Companies are eager to sell innovative and fancy products, but they must thoroughly assess their benefits-risks balance at each step of the life-cycle of the products,” says Mathilde Detcheverry, Avicenn’s policy manager. From August the EU will ban use of TiO2 nanos in food (where it is called E171) and the European Commission recently announced that 12 nanomaterials would soon be prohibited in cosmetics. Detcheverry says: “As scientific knowledge about the environmental and health impacts of engineered nanos such as silver and titanium dioxide advances, we need to make sure nanos are only allowed for specific and essential uses in order to minimise any adverse effects at the source and [ensure they are] not released uncontrollably.” Two years after the release of Ikea’s Gunrid curtains, Avicenn tried to buy more for further tests, but they had been withdrawn from sale.  'I wash all my food like crazy': scientists voice concern about nanoparticles Ikea told the Guardian that Gunrid remained “safe to use as a traditional curtain” but it was withdrawn because “the functionality was not as effective as expected”. If that’s true – for example, that despite TiO2 having proven photocatalytic properties and being used in self-cleaning and air-purifying products, its efficacy on curtains could be localised and not powerful – then at the very least Ikea’s experience suggests nanoparticles’ benefits may not outweigh the potential and frequently unknown risks, Detcheverry says. “Nanoparticles are often promoted as silver bullets against pollution or bacteria,” she says, “but we must make sure that the cure is not worse than the disease.” Gunrid was just one product of many thousands that use nanoparticles. As Ikea’s Affonso says in the video: “What’s so great about Gunrid is that this technology could be applied to any textile.” https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/apr/25/nano-state-tiny-and-now-everywhere-how-big-a-problem-are-nanoparticles ……………..