Tuesday, November 24, 2020

Computerized voting gives power of selection to whoever controls the computer

 6-9-2016     Two days before the California primary I wrote “If the 2016 Democratic primary in California is rigged, it’s ‘‘the boys’ from one company—Sequoia Pacific nee Dominion Voting Systems, working out of San Leandro and Oakland and tiny Exeter in the San Joaquin Valley—who’ll likely be charged with making it happen.”

I’m not gifted psychically.  But making that call was easy.  Why?  Because these are the go-to guys for this sort of thing.  Also, several years ago California’s then-Secretary of State left to go to work for the company after steering them a good chunk of the state’s business.  So, there’s that.    A felony conviction may prevent you from voting in states like Florida, but having an arm-long rap sheet doesn’t disqualify you from counting millions of other people’s votes.   https://www.madcowprod.com/2016/06/09/hey-california-election-rigged/

…………………………………………………….

11-29-2004  computer experts who insist that electronic voting machines can be rigged.  And that if they can be rigged, they are… because if you leave the bank vault open, sooner or later someone is going to rob it.   -Hopsicker

  https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0411/S00376.htm

………………………………………………..……..................................

9-16-2002   Computerized voting machines that were certified by the state of Florida, caused most of the problems in Florida's primary election.  In the absence of paper ballots, the damage is now irreversible.  This was no accident.  It's not new.  And Florida is not alone.

"The concept is clear, simple, and it works.  Computerized voting gives the power of selection, without fear of discovery, to whoever controls the computer," wrote the authors of VoteScam (1992), James & Kenneth Collier (both now deceased).  It's a 'must read' book about how elections have been electronically and mechanically rigged in the United States for decades, and with the knowing and sometimes unknowing support of media giants and government officials, including... ironically... Janet Reno.

  Only a few companies dominate the market for computer voting machines.  Alarmingly, under U.S. federal law, no background checks are required on these companies or their employees. Felons and foreigners can, and do, own computer voting machine companies.  Voting machine companies demand that clients sign 'proprietary' contracts to protect their trade secrets, which prohibits a thorough inspection of voting machines by outsiders.  And, unbelievably, it appears that most election officials don't require paper ballots to back up or audit electronic election results. So far, lawsuits to allow complete access to inspect voting machines, or to require paper ballots so that recounts are possible...have failed.   https://archive.commondreams.org/scriptfiles/views02/0916-04.htm

………………..........................................

5-12-2016 

  https://blackboxvoting.org/category/elections-industry/

.....................................................................................

10-31-2004    Bev Harris appeared before the California Voting Systems Panel (CVSP) on April 21, 2004, presenting a smoking gun Diebold internal memo proving the company had not corrected Diebold's Global Election Systems (GEMS) software flaws even though it had updated and upgraded the GEMS program.  She also showed Democrat Howard Dean how to fraudulently alter the GEMS system on CNBC-TV.

  In a convened August 11, 2004 CVSP meeting, member Jim March formally requested a demonstration of the double set of books in GEMS; and while the short 3-minute demonstration had been scheduled, the panel refused to watch it and would not look at Harris' presentation.  Curiously, the panel met privately afterwards with Diebold officials--but without informing the public or issuing a report about the potential for vote fraud this fall.

  Harris and her associate director Andy Stephenson, along with computer security expert Dr. Hugh Thompson and former King County, Washington elections supervisor Julie Anne Kempf, met with members of CVSP and the California Attorney General's office to demonstrate the double set of books in the GEMS system.

  The Secretary of State's office stopped the meeting, called in the general counsel for their office and a defense attorney from the California Attorney General's office--refusing to allow Harris and Stephenson to videotape their own GEMS demonstration, while also prohibiting any audiotape and specifying that no notes of the meeting could be requested in public records (Freedom of Information Act--F.O.I.A.) requests.


  Harris told us that Diebold knew about the problem too--or should have known--because the company issued a "cease and desist" action against her website when she originally reported the problem in 2003.  Harris also offered to show the problem to Marvin Singleton, Diebold's damage control expert and other Diebold executives; however she said they refused to look at it.


  The state of Maryland commissioned its own report regarding Diebold's system from Science Application International Corporation (SAIC) of California, with Diebold allowing SAIC to examine the system using its touch-screen source code.  Consistent with Black Box Voting assertions of election accuracy risk, SAIC also said the Diebold system was subject to "several high risks of vulnerabilities."

  Interestingly Maryland went ahead and purchased $55 million worth of the Diebold electronic touch-screen machines.  The state's recently hired computer experts have been able to hack the Diebold machines with ease; and they were able to change the vote counts directly on precinct machines--but also by using a modem.


  In a move with likely far-reaching ramifications for the whole country, the presidential battleground state of Ohio cited the same security risks that Maryland found; but curiously, Ohio also gave its counties the ok to purchase electronic systems, despite the demonstrated ease of vote fraud: Diebold (40 counties), ES&S (11), Hart InterCivic (7), and Sequoia (4). Again, no one has promulgated litigation--despite prior knowledge of voting security risks.


  "The Diebold Global Elections System voting software, which runs on a Microsoft Access database, can read election vote totals from a false vote set," says Harris, who added that Diebold purchased Texas-based GEMS in 2002.  GEMS stores the votes in a ledger built in Microsoft Access; but while accounting programs only allow one set of books, Diebold's GEMS system contained three sets of "books," according to Harris' findings.  http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/301469.shtml

.........................................................................................

  But those who revel while still knowing the Laws of God--though partially ignorant, it is true--are known as black magicians or the tools thereof.  Some teachings, under the guise of goodness, would deny the existence of such as these, stating that positive qualities must be emphasized rather than negation.  How well the Archangels are aware of this lie of human creation, but we also know that in the realm of human domination “all is not well” and the causes and cores of mankind’s lack of well-being are known to us….Let increasing faith bring more light to all!    

-Archangel Michael:  Pearls of Wisdom 7:39

……………………………………………………………………………………………

  The planet Uranus, just like the other planets in our solar system, has a causal body of light and perfection, which contains all of the good qualities, the good words and works, of the evolutions who have lived there.  It also has a subconscious, or an electronic belt, which contains the accumulation of the negative qualifications of her lifewaves.

  Whatever we magnetize to ourselves from Uranus, whether from her causal body or her electronic belt, we can be certain that like elements within ourselves will be the determining factor.  So if we have externalized the positive qualities associated with Uranus, we will attract to ourselves these momentums from her causal body.  Likewise if we are vulnerable at the subconscious level through our untransmuted karma, we will attract the negative vibrations of her electronic belt.

  If the latter be the case, we will be vulnerable to the first horseman of the four, the white horse.  The same will be true for the remaining three planets and the horsemen they represent.  And where we have both good and bad karma there is a delicate balance.  Alot depends on our freewill and sense of self-determination….

  Neptune rules Pisces, the sign that on the positive side indicates liberation through ultimate self-sacrifice and on the negative side indicates physical or psychological imprisonment due to self-delusion.  Neptune rules matters that are often shrouded from public sight but that have physical consequences, such as drug abuse and the transmission of venereal diseases.                          -Messenger E C Prophet:  based on her 5-21-1989 lecture given at NYC, Pearl 33:10

………………………………..


No comments:

Post a Comment