Monday, November 16, 2020

backdrop of computerized voting


  by Victoria Collier        As the twentieth century came to a close, a brave new world of election rigging emerged, and two major events paved the way:  the mass adoption of computerized voting technology, and the outsourcing of our elections to a handful of corporations that operate in the shadows, with little oversight or accountability. 

  This privatization of our elections has occurred without public knowledge or consent, leading to one of the most dangerous and least understood crises in the history of American democracy:  we have actually lost the ability to verify election results.   By means of proprietary, corporate-owned software, just one programmer could steal hundreds, thousands, potentially millions of votes with the stroke of a key.  It’s the electoral equivalent of a drone strike.                                                                                                                                                                       The use of computers in elections began around the time of the Voting Rights Act.  Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the use of optical scanners to process paper ballots became widespread, usurping local hand counting. The media, anxious to get on the air with vote totals, hailed the faster and more efficient computerized count.  In the twenty-first century, a new technology became ubiquitous:  Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting, which permits touchscreen machines and does not require a paper trail….

Nebraska US Senate race 1996.  Three days before the election, however, a poll conducted by the Omaha World-Herald showed a dead heat, with 47 percent of respondents favoring each candidate. David Moore, who was then managing editor of the Gallup Poll, told the paper, “We can’t predict the outcome.”

  Hagel’s victory in the general election, invariably referred to as an “upset,” handed the seat to the GOP for the first time in eighteen years.  Hagel trounced Nelson by fifteen points. Even for those who had factored in the governor’s deteriorating numbers and a last-minute barrage of negative ads, this divergence from pre-election polling was enough to raise eyebrows across the nation.  Until shortly before the election, Hagel had been chairman of the company whose computerized voting machines would soon count his own votes.

Hagel won an astonishing 83 percent of the vote—among the largest margins of victory in any statewide race in Nebraska’s history. And with nearly 400,000 registered Democrats on the rolls, Matulka managed to scrape up only 70,290 votes.  Hagel had never actually disclosed his financial ties to ES&S, and Matulka requested an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee. His request was rejected. Equally futile was his call for a hand count of the ballots, since a state law specified that recounts had to be conducted using the very same “vote-counting device” that was used to begin with—in this case, the ES&S optical scanners….Our faith-based elections are the result of a new Dark Age in American democracy, brought on, paradoxically, by technological progress.

Harper's Magazine, November 2012  https://www.electiondefense.org/how-to-rig-an-election

No comments:

Post a Comment