Pause for station identification

Patriarch, patron, patriot, prophet. Cosmic Christ with bodhisattvas41+58=99, using numerology. The opposition to Cosmic Christ58 is mediocrity 58, reactionary and justification, both 57, and supercilious59. Analgous to the five poisons, antidoted by the 5 dhyani buddhas. Analgous? Yes, as supercilious is a prideful show of ego acting superior because it retains a sense of inferior or human fracturedness which it does not surrender willingly into the flame of life as necessary purging. Pride is one of the five poisons that needs to be antidoted; supercilious is a mode that pridefulness uses. ///////////////////////Monopoly is like a 3 year old saying, upon his mother’s prompting to be nice: “Hi, my name is Ricky. See this? This is mine and you can’t have any.” But the monopolists like Ricky feel they are right and that monopoly is somehow natural or necessary, efficient. Man can rationalize anything and he does. Now Mary Baker Eddy, Tolken, George Orwell, Lincoln—these were generations ahead of their time. None were monopolists; all challenged the dominant and increasingly dominant and illogical paradigm of their day and age which is more or less Monopoly. Now like Lincoln, like Edgar Cayce, Mark and Elizabeth Prophet have been patriarchs or lawgivers, like Mary Baker Eddy, coming from deep, a number of generations ahead of their time. Newton was ahead of his time too. Many of us do not understand the severity of dichotomy between, say, Lincoln’s style and vision and that of the monopolists who wanted him out of their way, their dominance, their country, their economy, their profits, their world. It is a strong dichotomy, so strong that the students of these very lawgivers cited above very often do not understand what the issue of monopoly is even about, why shouldn’t we play that game too; one hears and notices them engaging headlong. Headlong in what? Many times headlong in acting as if they themselves are the lawgiver! Yes, my name is Ricky and…!! So we are generally educated to believe that there is no lasting significance to fathom in Lincoln, Cayce, the Prophets, Mary Baker Eddy, as if they just “had their hour upon the stage and are no more.” That is, “I’m the lawgiver or authority now, those people are dead and that’s that.” But that is not in this case that. The lawgiver is because the law of life is giving for keeps, not for a passing fancy, not to dominate a generation. And so lawgiver should be capitalized as a rarity, a deep office, and presented as many people are wont to do with George Washington. But the statues of Lenin and Stalin are upheld by the likes of Putin, so it isn’t an automatic thing going on here, is it now? There is a phony Lawgiver, unreal26, pretend37, a tyrant26 with propensity to betray26. Yet commonly such are in self-justification, thank you, thank you, now Follow Orders. That’s a different kind of Lawgiver altogether, but the difference is intentionally blurred for a reason, you know. I t’ink you know, but do you?