Tuesday, August 28, 2018

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects

4th Amendment US Constitution:  The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched
………………………………………………………………………………….
unreasonable search and seizure. n. search of an individual or his/her premises (including an automobile) and/or seizure of evidence found in such a search by a law enforcement officer without a search warrant and without "probable cause" to believe evidence of a crime is present.  https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2201
……………………………………………………………………………………….
   We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States
.........................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................

7-24-2014   In reality, a health report may just be the most enticing carrot 23andMe was able to dream up in order to get your DNA in its computers.  As noted by the authors of an article in The New England Journal of Medicine, “23andMe has...suggested that its longer-range goal is to collect a massive biobank of genetic information that can be used and sold for medical research and could also lead to patentable discoveries.”  This characterization is not denied by 23andMe, which tells Newsweek, “The primary mission of our company is to accelerate genetic discovery.”
The real money then isn’t selling you a health analysis; it’s in using and selling your data for biomedical research.
It’s not much different from how Google, Yahoo and Facebook give us search engines, email and social networking for free, only to sell all the information they gather to anyone wishing to market products to us.   https://www.newsweek.com/2014/08/01/whos-keeping-your-data-safe-dna-banks-261136.html
…………………………………………..……………………………………………
2-4-2010      "We were appalled when we found out," says Brown, who's a registered nurse.  "Why do they need to store my baby's DNA indefinitely? Something on there could affect her ability to get a job later on, or get health insurance."
According to the state of Minnesota's Web site, samples are kept so that tests can be repeated, if necessary, and in case the DNA is ever need to help parents identify a missing or deceased child.  The samples are also used for medical research.

Art Caplan, a bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania, says he understands why states don't first ask permission to screen babies for genetic diseases.  "It's paternalistic, but the state has an overriding interest in protecting these babies," he says.
However, he added that storage of DNA for long periods of time is a different matter.
"I don't see any reason to do that kind of storage," Caplan says.  "If it's anonymous, then I don't care.  I don't have an issue with that.  But if you keep names attached to those samples, that makes me nervous.”  http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/04/baby.dna.government/index.html
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
5-13-2018   The warning comes from the Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom, which has fought for the privacy rights of parents and children for years.
“As things stand, in just over two months parents will lose their consent rights for the use of their newborn baby’s DNA for federally funded research, once the revised Common Rule goes into effect on July 19, 2018,” the organization said.
“That which the government holds, the government owns,” said
Twila Brase, chief of the CCHF organization.   “A child’s DNA held by the government could be sequenced, meaning a baby’s genetic code could be completely detailed and mapped – and then recorded in a state government database, used and shared.
“This is private information on America’s tiniest citizens, who will grow into adults stripped of their genetic privacy when they weren’t able to protect themselves.
The change comes as a result of the final version of the “Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects,” known as the Common Rule.  CCHF worked in 2014 to secure privacy protections under the Newborn Screening Saves Lives Reauthorization Act, which required parental consent for the use of newborn DNA for federally funded research.
Barack Obama signed it, but it was under his administration that those protections later were deleted, since the plan was for the rule to take effect Jan. 19, 2017, the day before President Trump’s inauguration.
The rule canceled the 2014 protections.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
their Central Banking Monopoly put forward in the days of, and with the backing of, J.P.. Morgan.     Etc.
-Paul M. Warburg, covert mastermind/architect of US Federal Reserve                 see the expose at:

(Paul Warburg and his plan was first opposed and exposed by
Charles Lindbergh Sr. who had been a banker in central bank-run Sweden before immigration into USA) -r
………………………………………………………………… 
how one-world covert blackhearted dictatorship operates:
http://www.eaec.org/newsletters/1999/NL1999jun.htm
..............................................................................



Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)