cipher work for the light

ECP in Dec. 18, 1977 Pearl wrote:     SAINT GERMAIN as Francis Bacon (1561-1626), Lord Chancellor of England, statesman, essayist, the “father of inductive science.”  His contemporaries believed that he was the son of Sir Nicholas Bacon, Keeper of the Great Seal of England during the reign of Elizabeth I. In the nineteenth century, however, the complete story of his life began to unfold….The idea that the “Shakespearean” plays were not the work of William Shakespeare has been the subject of scores of books, first based on the obvious disparity between the magnificent work and the somewhat obscure character of Shakespeare–a common actor with insufficient learning, the son of a small provincial tradesman at Stratford-on-Avon. In contrast, the plays exhibit the genius of one with extensive education in language and literature, thorough knowledge of law, history and politics, firsthand experience in the high courts of Europe, and unquestioning familiarity with the manners and speech of royalty–requirements so aptly met by Lord Bacon.      (true!)  

Following another less speculative method of investigation, literary scholars late in the (19th) century discovered within the “Shakespearean” works a strange and secret tragedy–a drama within a drama–written in intricate cipher. Step-by-step, amazed cryptographers deciphered the concealed history of Elizabethan England and with it the true identity of Francis Bacon   (not true!!!)           as the rightful heir to the English throne, the fils naturel of Queen Elizabeth and Lord Leicester. Francis was given over at birth to Sir Nicholas and his Puritan wife Lady Anne.     (true.)   -POW 20:51          my ( )   -r   

...........................      

Furthermore, as was discovered in the 1890s in two separate ciphers  (false!)    -ECP, p. 266, book 1 of Lords of the Seven Rays, 1986.  

why not true!!!  Owen and Wells-Gallup could never prove their 2 methods were sound/repeatable.  They were not trained cryptographers at all, but they did make many claims, o yes, very many!  

why false!  Their work was speculative mixed with some intuition.  To claim “ciphers” means to show ciphers--ECP neither studied in depth these 2 nor did she do cryptography nor did Saint Germain reveal or infer in any dictation this assertion from these 2!      

-r.