The heart of the British strategy in case of war was “overwhelming naval strength based on a few select fortresses,” especially Bermuda and Halifax (in today’s Nova Scotia). (Bourne 208) British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston dispatched a powerful squadron of eight ships of the line and thirteen frigates and corvettes under Admiral Milne to the western Atlantic, and wanted to use the Great Eastern, the largest ship in the world, as a troop transport. London even considered ways to foment secession in Maine. Bombarding and burning both Boston and New York was actively considered as a contingency; it was concluded that the reduction of Boston would be very difficult because of the channels and forts; New York was seen as more vulnerable, especially to a surprise attack. An Admiralty hydrographer saw New York City as “the true heart of [US] commerce, — the centre of …maritime resources; to strike her would be to paralyse all the limbs.” (Bourne 240)…
The critical importance of Russian help in deterring the British and Napoleon III as well is borne out by a closer analysis. As early as 1861, Russia alerted the Lincoln government to the machinations of Napoleon III, who was already scheming to promote a joint UK-France-Russia intervention in favor of the Confederacy. [6] As Henry Adams, the son and private secretary of US Ambassador to London Charles Francis Adams, sums up the strategic situation during Lee’s first invasion of Maryland, on the eve of the Battle of Antietam: These were the terms of this singular problem as they presented themselves to the student of diplomacy in 1862: Palmerston, on September 14, under the impression that the President was about to be driven from Washington and the Army of the Potomac dispersed, suggested to Russell that in such a case, intervention might be feasible. Russell instantly answered that, in any case, he wanted to intervene and should call a Cabinet for the purpose. Palmerston hesitated; Russell insisted….
On September 22, 1862, Lincoln used the Confederate repulse at Antietam to issue a warning that slavery would be abolished in areas still engaged in rebellion against the United States on January 1, 1863. The Russian Tsar Alexander II had liberated the 23 million serfs of the Russian Empire in 1861, so this underlined the nature of the US-Russian convergence as a force for human freedom….
it is not surprising that (historian) Jones has little interest in the Russian aspect of the problem, although he does concede that “Russia’s pro-Union (US) sentiment prevented participation in any policy alien to the Lincoln Administration’s wishes.” (Jones 228)
The Russian-British rivalry was of course the central antagonism of European history after the Napoleonic era(Historiann) Thomas shows that the proposed British-French interference promoted by Lord Russell, the Foreign Secretary, in October 1862 was “deterred at this time mainly” by the Russian attitude, and cites Russell’s note to Palmerston concluding that Britain “ought not to move at present without Russia.” [5] (Thomas 132)
The critical importance of Russian help in deterring the British and Napoleon III as well is borne out by a closer analysis. As early as 1861, Russia alerted the Lincoln government to the machinations of Napoleon III, who was already scheming to promote a joint UK-France-Russia intervention in favor of the Confederacy. [6] As Henry Adams, the son and private secretary of US Ambassador to London Charles Francis Adams, sums up the strategic situation during Lee’s first invasion of Maryland, on the eve of the Battle of Antietam: These were the terms of this singular problem as they presented themselves to the student of diplomacy in 1862: Palmerston, on September 14, under the impression that the President was about to be driven from Washington and the Army of the Potomac dispersed, suggested to Russell that in such a case intervention might be feasible. Russell instantly answered that, in any case, he wanted to intervene and should call a Cabinet for the purpose. Palmerston hesitated; Russell insisted….” [7]
… The London Times accused Lincoln in lurid and racist terms of wanting to provoke a slave rebellion and a race war (with the Emancipation Proclamation of Jan 1863).
On October 7, 1862, despite the news that the Confederates had been repulsed at Antietam, the British Chancellor of the Exchequer William Gladstone, who spoke for Lord John Russell, pressed for British intervention against the Union and on the side of the Confederacy in a speech at Tyneside, saying: “. . . We know quite well that the people of the Northern States have not yet drunk of the cup [of defeat and partition] — they are still trying to hold it far from their lips — which all the rest of the world see they nevertheless must drink of.… We may anticipate with certainty the success of the Southern States so far as regards their separation from the North”. [8]
It was practically a declaration of war against the Lincoln government, and it also contained a lie, since Gladstone knew better than most that the only navy the Confederacy ever had was the one provided with British connivance.
On October 13, 1862 Lord John Russell called a meeting of the British cabinet for October 23, with the top agenda item being a deliberation on the “duty of Europe to ask both parties, in the most friendly and conciliatory terms, to agree to a suspension of arms.” [9] Russell wanted an ultimatum to Washington and Richmond for an armistice or cease-fire, followed by a lifting of the Union blockade of southern ports, followed then by negotiations leading to Washington’s recognition of the CSA as an independent state….At this point, Napoleon III of France invited London to join him in a move against the Union. According to Adams’ memoir, “Instantly Napoleon III appeared as the ally of Russell and Gladstone with a proposition which had no sense except as a bribe to Palmerston to replace America, from pole to pole, in her old dependence on Europe, and to replace England in her old sovereignty of the seas, if Palmerston would support France in Mexico…. The only resolute, vehement, conscientious champion of Russell, Napoleon III and Jefferson Davis was Gladstone.” [11] …There was no real hope of getting pro-Union Russia to join such an initiative, and the reason Napoleon III included Russia was merely as camouflage to cloak the fact that the whole enterprise was a hostile act against Washington.
The clouds of world war gathered densely over the planet. Russell and Gladstone, now joined by Napoleon III, continued to demand aggressive meddling in US affairs. This outcome was avoided because of British and French fears of what Russia might do if they continued to launch bellicose gestures against the Union. On October 29, 1862 there occurred in St. Petersburg an extremely cordial meeting of Russian Foreign Minister Gortchakov with US chargé d’affaires Bayard Taylor which was marked by a formal Russian pledge never to move against the US and to oppose any attempt by other powers to do so. Taylor reported these comments by Gortchakov to the State Department: “You know the sentiments of Russia. We desire above all things the maintenance of the American Union as one indivisible nation. We cannot take any part, more than we have done. We have no hostility to the Southern people. Russia has declared her position and will maintain it. There will be proposals of intervention [by Britain and France]. We believe that intervention could do no good at present. Proposals will be made to Russia to join some plan of interference. She will refuse any intervention of the kind. Russia will occupy the same ground as at the beginning of the struggle. You may rely upon it, she will not change. But we entreat you to settle the difficulty.
Journal de St. Petersbourg, the official gazette of the Tsarist government, denounced the Anglo-French intervention plan against the US, which had been inspired by Russell. This article helped prevent a wider war: the British cabinet, informed of the Russian attitude by telegraph, voted down Russell’s aggressive project. Russell made his last bid to swing the British cabinet in favor of a policy of interference together with Napoleon III against the Union on November 12, 1862, but he was unable to carry the day, and this turned out to be his last chance for the year….
The most dramatic gestures of cooperation between the Russian Empire and the United States came in the autumn of 1863. On September 24, the Russian Baltic fleet began to arrive in New York harbor. On October 12, the Russian Far East fleet began to arrive in San Francisco. …The Russian admirals had also been told that, if the US and Russia were to find themselves at war with Britain and France, the Russian ships should place themselves under Lincoln’s command and operate in synergy with the US Navy against the common enemies…. Coming on the heels of the bloody Union reverse at Chickamauga, the news of the Russian fleet unleashed an immense wave of euphoria in the North. It was this moment that inspired the later verses of Oliver Wendell Holmes, one of the most popular writers in America, for the 1871 friendship visit of the Russian Grand Duke Alexis:
Bleak are our shores with the blasts of December,
Fettered and chill is the rivulet’s flow;
Thrilling and warm are the hearts that remember
Who was our friend when the world was our foe.
Fires of the North in eternal communion,
Blend your broad flashes with evening’s bright star;
God bless the Empire that loves the Great Union
Strength to her people! Long life to the Czar! [15]…
Soon after the war, Russia sold Alaska to the United States, in part because they felt that an influx of Americans searching for gold was inevitable, and in part to keep the British from seizing control of this vast region….
As it was, Lincoln fell victim to an assassination plot in which British intelligence, through Canada and other channels played an important role. Alexander II was killed in 1881 by Russian terrorists of the London-centered post-Bakunin anarchist networks. -by Webster G. Tarpley, 2011
https://www.voltairenet.org/article169488.html
................................................................
In 1773 Meyer Rothschild held a secret meeting in the House of Rothschild at Jundestrasse, Frankfurt Germany, with twelve wealthy and influential European Financiers to discuss a manual of action to gain eventual control of the entire wealth of the world.
At this meeting the English (Cromwell) Revolution and the means of gaining control of England's wealth was discussed and the formal outline which would eventually be known as the 24 "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" were outlined. These Protocols had their roots in the Sanhedren during the Babylonian captivity of Israel and were developed as a means to covertly destabilize enemy nations. These Protocols were kept quite secret, but in 1901 these documents fell into the hands of Russian Professor S. Nilus. He had them published in Russian under the title: "The Jewish Peril." Victor Marsden then had them translated into English under the title: "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" in 1921. These may have changed somewhat since the original meeting in 1773.
The First Protocol stressed the importance of gaining control of money in order to gain control of a nation: "...Whether a State exhausts itself in it's own convulsions, whether it's internal discord brings it under the power of external foes, in any case it can be accounted irretrievably lost: It is in our power. The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out a straw that the State willy-nilly must take hold of, if not it goes to the bottom. ..."
The second Protocol stressed the need to control the press:
..In the hands of the States of today there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. ..."
The third Protocol shows the means of increasing their power:
..We appear on the scene as the alleged saviors of the worker from this oppression when we propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces Socialists, Anarchists, Communists To whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social masonry. ..." The fourth protocol states the need to lesson the peoples’ faith in God:
..It is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the minds of the Goyim (Gentile) the very principle of Godhead and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material need. ..."
The fifth protocol states the need to create confusion:
..In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the Goyim loose their head in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political. ..."
The sixth protocol states the need to create the desire for luxury in the common man:
. To complete the ruin of the industry of the Goyim ... we have developed among the Goyim the greedy demand for luxury that is swallowing up everything ... We shall raise the state of wages, which however, will not bring any advantage to the worker, for at the same time, we shall produce a rise in prices...In order that the true meaning of things will not strike the Goyim before the proper time, we shall mask it under an alleged ardent desire to serve the working classes and the great principles of political economy about which our economic theories are carrying on an energetic propaganda."
The seventh protocol states the means to gain control of existing governments:
"The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces are all essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans. What we have to get at is that there shall be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers. ..."
The eight protocol shows the means of training and controlling national leaders:
.. Our directorate must surround itself with all those forces of civilization among which it will have to work. It will surround itself with publicists, practical jurists, public administrators, diplomats, and finally with persons prepared by a special super educational training in our special schools ... For a time until thee no longer be any risk in entrusting responsible posts in our States to brother Jews, we shall put them in the hands of persons whose past and reputation are such that between them and the people there lays an abyss, persons who in case of disobedience to our instructions, must face criminal charges or disappear. This in order to make them defend our interests to their last gasp."
The ninth protocol shows the means of using human weakness to create the international super government:
... And the weapons in our hands are limitless ambitions, burning greediness, merciless vengeance, hatreds and malice. It is from us that the all engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our services persons of all opinions, of all doctrines, restorating monarchists, demagogues, socialists, communists, and utopian dreamers of every kind. We have harnessed them all to the task: Each one of them on his own account is boring away at the last remnants of authority, is striving to overthrow all established forms of order. By these acts all states are in torture; they exhort to tranquility, are ready to sacrifice anything for peace: But we will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international Super Government, and with submissiveness."
There are 24 of these Protocols and these are but short excerpts from some given to convey the spirit of their method for overthrowing the Nations of the World. A complete reading of the Protocols would reveal why the present World is in the present confused mess. http://www.usa-the-republic.com/illuminati/cfr_3.html
…………........................................................................./…..
No comments:
Post a Comment