Congressional “laws” that are flimsier than toilet paper

17:20 to 18:50 of this video: explanation of how European laws are biased in favor of corporations https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8iTzDZ-Jn0 ……………….. in US law a bioweapon is a toxin or bio-agent not used for “protective, prophylactic” purposes. Pfizer has been in court battles for many decades, so their lawyers are very aware of how to stretch, massage or interpret those 2 words. Then the US Congress laws like PREP 2005 are incredibly nice, like granting immunity, to Pharma; another layer insulating Pharma: international law where there are German and mainland China Pharma partners involved. Let us consider the degree of favoritism though: with the PREP Act 2005 the US Senate voted 93-0 in favor. Yet Sen. E. Kennedy later said it should be repealed. In the opioid scandals that preceded the present set- up, Congress according to a WaPo exposure some 6 years ago was playing footsie all right. In opiod-abuse across more than a decade outreach places like Walmart have been found guilty; hence for the modified-RNA stuff Congress extended immunity to basically everyone involved in the product production, so Walmart and other Pharma outlets went with these injections under such “legal” largess or cover or whatever one calls it. Well, “pitiless, ambitious, pettiness, connive”—these terms may well apply, but how could that hold Congress and Congress’ check-writing-for- reward system to account? What will hold Congress to account when the US judicial system will not throw out Congressional “laws” that are flimsier than toilet paper? There is only “We the People” and karmic law left. -r.