How Bill Gates is pretty much at the hub of the world “health” monopoly-industry

1) TB Alliance, an international non-profit drug development organization that develops better, faster-acting, and affordable tuberculosis (TB) drugs, has announced that it is collaborating with, and has granted an exclusive license to, the Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Development Co., Ltd., and its subsidiary Shenyang Hongqi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Fosun Pharma), to develop and commercialize the first-ever regimen designed to treat both drug-sensitive TB (DS-TB) and multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB) for use within People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau (Licensed Territory). PaMZ, a novel TB drug regimen, shows the potential to be a shorter, simpler, safer and affordable treatment for both DS-TB and some forms of MDR-TB. The collaboration, announced today at the Global Health Product Development Forum, organized by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, in Seattle, Washington, is important to help expedite the final stage of clinical development and, if successful, ensure that the promising PaMZ treatment is made available in the Licensed Territory to the people who need it.
“Through this partnership, Fosun Pharma will both help support the global registration of urgently needed new tools for TB, while also retaining the benefits of a traditional product developer within their core market; this is the sort of agreement that product development partnerships are able to achieve to benefit the millions of patients needlessly dying from neglected diseases of poverty such as TB.”…The TB Alliance operates with funding from Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Department for International Development (DFID), European Commission (DFAT), Global Health Innovative Technology Fund (GHIT Fund), Irish Aid, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), UNITAID, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). https://www.tbonline.info/posts/2014/4/28/tb-alliance-grants-fosun-pharma-rights-develop-mar/ …………….............................. THE MOST CENTRAL AND DANGEROUS COMPONENT IN THE BIOWEAPON CALLED A VACCINE BY MANY IS THE LIPID NANO-GLYCOL THING VERY LIKELY MADE BY FOSUN IN OR NEAR SHANGHAI and then delivered and not quality-controlled by Pfizer because Pfizer does not CARE what China puts into it as long as the globalists get their agenda rolling. Fosun operates also in Boston and Princeton. Gates Foundation includes $billions of Warren Buffet and others.-r. …………………………....................... 2) …with cutting-edge technologies to develop pioneering therapeutics for cancer and other serious diseases. The Foundation is working with BioNTech on developing preclinical vaccines and immunotherapy candidates to prevent HIV and tuberculosis infection as well as lead to durable antiretroviral therapy-free remission of HIV disease. Investment Date: September 2019 https://sif.gatesfoundation.org/investments/biontech/ …………………......................... 3) mRNA vaccine is expected to seek emergency approval for its vaccine candidate from India’s drug regulator next week. Gates Ventures, the private equity arm of Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and a clutch of other philanthropic organizations are in talks to invest in Indian vaccine makers and Gennova is top on that list.
 Gates Ventures has in the past invested in companies such as Aurobindo Pharma and Biological E to support their manufacturing of anti-HIV drugs and scale up vaccine manufacturing.
Gates Foundation and other organizations are redoubling efforts to reach coronavirus vaccines to countries where access has been hampered by shortages as India, the world’s largest vaccine maker, stopped exports after a second wave hit the country.
Norway-based Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) is also in talks with Indian vaccine makers for a possible early-stage investment in COVID-19 candidates. India is the founding member of CEPI, which is a global collaboration between public, private, philanthropic, and civil society organizations
Founded in Davos by the governments of India and Norway, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the World Economic Forum are other founders. A mission - India centric epidemic preparedness through rapid vaccine development: supporting Indian vaccine development aligned with the global initiative of the CEPI is a recent initiative of India's Department of Biotechnology to support vaccine development.
Earlier this year, several financial institutions, including Exim Bank and the Japanese Bank of International Corporation, met with vaccine makers to explore funding strategies to help scale up manufacturing activities. In July, Exim and JBIC offered to provide funding up to $300 million to vaccine companies.  Global organizations expect India to play a significant part in supplying vaccines to developing countries. At the G20 meeting in Rome last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that Indian companies will be ready to manufacture 5 billion doses by the end of 2022. https://www.thepharmaletter.com/article/indian-vaccine-makers-to-get-funds-from-gates-ventures-cepi ……………............................... 4) What’s not being said about Pfizer by F. William Engdahl Updated at 11:49pm on November 17, 2020 BILL Gates is actively financing and promoting new untested vaccines supposed to keep us at least somewhat safe from a ghastly death from the novel coronavirus and supposedly allow us to resume somewhat ‘normal’ lives. The pharma giant Pfizer has now announced what they claim were spectacular results in initial human tests. They use an experimental technology known as gene editing, specifically mRNA gene editing, something never before used in vaccines. Before we rush to get jabbed in hopes of some immunity we should know more about the radical experimental technology and its lack of precision. The financial world went ballistic on November 9 when the pharma giant Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, announced in a company press release that it had developed a vaccine for COVID-19 that was ‘90 per cent’ effective. The controversial US head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Tony Fauci, rushed to greet the news and the European Union announced it had purchased 300 million doses of the costly new vaccine. If you believe financial markets, the pandemic is all but past history. Suspicious events HOWEVER, it seems Albert Bourla, the chief executive officer of Pfizer, doesn’t share the confidence of his own claims. On the day his company issued its press release on the proposed vaccine trials, he sold 62 per cent of his stock in Pfizer, making millions profit in the deal. He made the sell order in a special option in August so it would not appear as ‘insider selling’, however he also timed it just after the US elections. It seems from appearances that Bourla had a pretty clear conflict of interest in the timing of his press release on the same day. Bourla lied and denied to press that his company had received any funds from the Trump administration to develop the vaccine when it came out they contracted in summer to deliver 100 million doses to the US government. Further adding to the suspect actions of Pfizer was the fact the company first informed the team of Joe Biden rather than the relevant US government agencies. But this is far from the only thing alarming about the much-hyped Pfizer announcement. The German partner PFIZER, famous for its Viagra and other drugs, has partnered with a small Mainz, Germany company, BioNTech, which has developed the radical mRNA technique used to produce the new coronavirus vaccine. BioNTech was only founded in 2008. BioNTech signed an agreement with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in September 2019, just before announcement in Wuhan, China of the novel coronavirus outbreak and just before BioNTech made its stock market debut. The agreement involved cooperation on developing new mRNA techniques to treat cancer and HIV. Curiously that press release, ‘The Gates Foundation sees BioNTech potential to “dramatically reduce global HIV and tuberculosis”’ (September 5, 2019), has now been deleted. BioNTech also has an agreement with one of the largest drug producers in China, Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd (‘Fosun Pharma’) to develop a version of its mRNA vaccine for the novel coronavirus for the Chinese market. Ai-Min Hui, president of global research and development of Fosun Pharma said in an August statement, ‘Dosing the first Chinese subject with BNT162b1 marks a milestone of the global co-development programme in China. We are closely working with BioNTech and regulatory authorities to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BNT162b1 and other mRNA vaccine candidates…’ This means that the same German biotech company is behind the COVID-19 vaccines being rushed out in China as well as the USA and EU. The vaccine is being rushed through to eventual approval in an alarmingly short time. Both US and EU authorities and presumably also Chinese, waived the standard animal tests using ferrets or mice and have gone straight to human ‘guinea pigs.’ Human tests began in late July and early August. Three months is unheard of for testing a new vaccine. Several years is the norm. Because of the degree of global panic engendered by the World Health Organisation over the coronavirus caution is thrown to the wind. Vaccine makers all have legal indemnity, meaning they can’t be sued if people die or are maimed from the new vaccine. But the most alarming fact about the new Pfizer-BioNTech gene edited vaccine is that the gene edited mRNA for human vaccine application has never before been approved. Notably, two peer reviewed tests with mice fed genetically modified corn sprayed with Monsanto glyphosate-rich Roundup first showed cancer tumours after nine months as well as liver and other organ damage. Earlier Monsanto company tests ended at three months and claimed no harm. A similar situation exists with the gene edited mRNA vaccines that are being rushed out after less than 90 days human tests. ‘Explicitly experimental’ DR MICHAEL Yeadon replied in a recent public social media comment to a colleague in the United Kingdom, ‘All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been… in development for more than a few months.’ Yeadon then went on to declare, ‘If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not explicitly experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for…whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.’ Yeadon is well qualified to make the critique. As he notes in the comment, ‘I have a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical research and development, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung and skin. I was a vice-president at Pfizer and the chief executive officer…of a biotech I founded (Ziarco — acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine research and developmnet.’ He was formerly with Pfizer at a very senior level. Human guinea pigs? THE Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is experimental and far from guaranteed safe, despite the fact that Pfizer, the EU and the notorious Dr Tony Fauci seem ready to roll it out even before the year ends to hundreds of millions of humans. The experimental technology is based on a rather new gene manipulation known as gene editing. In a major article in the 2018 New York Council on Foreign Relations magazine, Foreign Affairs, Bill Gates effusively promoted the novel gene editing CRISPR technology as being able to ‘transform global development.’ He noted that his Gates Foundation had been financing gene editing developments for vaccines and other applications for a decade. But is the technology for breaking and splicing of human genes so absolutely safe that it is worth risking on a novel experimental vaccine never before used on humans? Contrary to what Bill Gates claims, the scientific answer is no, it is not proven so safe. In a peer reviewed article in the October 2020 journal Trends in Genetics the authors conclude that ‘the range of possible molecular events resulting from genome editing has been underestimated and the technology remains unpredictable on, and away from, the target locus.’ Dr Romeo Quijano, retired professor of pharmacology and toxicology at the College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, noted some of the dangers of the experimental gene editing when applied to human vaccines. Quijano warns of ‘the danger that the vaccine might actually “enhance” the pathogenicity of the virus, or make it more aggressive possibly due to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), as what happened with previous studies on test vaccines in animals. If that should happen in a major human trial the outcome could be disastrous. This serious adverse effect may not even be detected by a clinical trial especially in highly biased clinical trials laden with conflicts of interest involving vaccine companies. Even when a serious adverse event is detected, this is usually swept under the rug.’ He cites the case of another Gates mRNA vaccine candidate, Moderna, where ‘three of the 15 human experimental subjects in the high dose group suffered serious and medically significant symptoms. Moderna, however, concluded that the vaccine was “generally safe and well tolerated,” which the corporate-dominated media dutifully reported, covering-up the real danger…’ He notes, ‘Exogenous mRNA is inherently immune-stimulatory, and this feature of mRNA could be beneficial or detrimental. It may provide adjuvant activity and it may inhibit antigen expression and negatively affect the immune response. The paradoxical effects of innate immune sensing on different formats of mRNA vaccines are incompletely understood.’ Quijano adds, ‘An mRNA-based vaccine could also induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity… and may promote blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation.’ Quijano writes in the extensively documented article, ‘among other dangers, the virus-vectored vaccines could undergo recombination with naturally occurring viruses and produce hybrid viruses that could have undesirable properties affecting transmission or virulence. The… possible outcomes of recombination are practically impossible to quantify accurately given existing tools and knowledge. The risks, however, are real, as exemplified by the emergence of mutant types of viruses, enhanced pathogenicity and unexpected serious adverse events (including death) following haphazard mass vaccination campaigns and previous failed attempts to develop chimeric vaccines using genetic engineering technology.’ Bill Gates, the mRNA vaccine makers including Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, and their close allies such as Dr Tony Fauci of the NIAID are clearly playing fast and loose with human lives in their rush to get these experimental vaccines into our bodies. Notably, the same Dr Fauci and his NIAID owns the patent on a vaccine for dengue fever known as Dengvaxia, marketed by Sanofi-Pasteur and promoted as an ‘essential’ vaccine by Tedros’s WHO since 2016. Robert F Kennedy jr noted that Fauci and NIAID ‘knew from the clinical trials that there was a problem with paradoxical immune response,’ but they gave it to several hundred thousand Filipino kids anyway. It was estimated that as many as 600 vaccinated children died before the government stopped the vaccinations. Clearly, the well established precautionary principle— if in serious doubt, don’t — is being ignored by Fauci, Pfizer/BioNTech and others in rushing to approve the new mRNA vaccine for the novel coronavirus. Messenger RNA technology has yet to produce an approved medicine, let alone a vaccine. https://www.newagebd.net/print/article/121851 ………………………........................... 5) check out this video:

5) https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yulh2DLrpvqu/ .....................................